Author | Thread |
|
09/16/2006 10:50:01 AM · #1 |
I've just callibrated my monitor and now all my pictures look TERRIBLE!! Would anyone with a properly calibrated monitor be willing to take a peek and tell me if they look as aweful on their monitor as they do on mine?
Want to make sure everyone else sees what I see before I post anything else. (And have to redo everything already out there.) Callibration was another first. Thanks DPC!! :)
Message edited by author 2006-09-22 00:35:53. |
|
|
09/16/2006 10:58:23 AM · #2 |
No, they don't look awful.
I'm guessing your monitor was too dark, as mine was (before calibrating). This one has no true blacks, for example:
This one looks fine. You can see some detail in all the dark areas:
Though a bit blue in those areas perhaps.
Message edited by author 2006-09-16 10:58:38.
|
|
|
09/16/2006 11:11:00 AM · #3 |
Thanks
hmmm, that my well have been the problem as now everything looks very
bright. wasn't sure if the contrast was also off. Which throws EVERYTHING off. |
|
|
09/16/2006 02:19:38 PM · #4 |
Try taking one of your shots (Jerome Door perhaps, which looks pretty good to me) and process another version so it looks, on your newly calibrated monitor, the way it used to look to you on your UNcalibrated monitor, and post those side-by-side so we can compare what you WERE seeing with what you NOW see. That would be interesting, and possibly instructive.
Robt.
|
|
|
09/16/2006 02:46:21 PM · #5 |
I'm having the same problem. Even our laptop looks better than my new monitor. Can't get the color right amd photos in photoshop look jaggy and blocky. Not even calibrating seems to do the trick.
I can see quite a lot of detail in your pic |
|
|
09/16/2006 04:48:06 PM · #6 |
Ok, here is what the TEST looks like.
Pre Callibration
First
Reworked
Now reworked after callibration
Please let me know what the differences are that you can see from the "pre" to the "post" callibration shots.
|
|
|
09/16/2006 05:19:59 PM · #7 |
Is it possible for you to process one NOW, on your newly-calibrated monitor, so that it looks the way the original looked TO YOU on your uncalibrated monitor? That's what I'm interested in seeing. FWIW the examples posted show distinct linear improvement.
R.
|
|
|
09/16/2006 05:30:51 PM · #8 |
I have Adobe Elements. I don't know how to get the information from the Jerome1 so that I may use the same recipe to process the post photo to be exactly the same. This is ALL very new to me. :)
I'm guessing that is what you mean. (SORRY...) |
|
|
09/16/2006 05:34:57 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by bergiekat: I have Adobe Elements. I don't know how to get the information from the Jerome1 so that I may use the same recipe to process the post photo to be exactly the same. This is ALL very new to me. :)
I'm guessing that is what you mean. (SORRY...) |
Never mind :-) My thought processes here were muddy. What you have posted is fine. The first example looked right to you on the pre-calibration monitor, and that's the one you gave us. The further examples show what looks right to you now you've calibrated. I was over-analyzing and lost track of logic.
R.
|
|
|
09/16/2006 05:36:32 PM · #10 |
To me the 1st one looks more natural - the others - color looks to saturated and over sharpened. Not to say this is actually true just according to my monitor |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/22/2025 06:13:23 PM EDT.