| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/25/2006 06:47:35 PM · #1 |
Hi All,
Do we have any relationship with the number of pixels and the printout size? I know there is.
how can I have large printout without grains or loosing photograph quality?
Message edited by author 2006-08-25 18:48:15. |
|
|
|
08/25/2006 06:57:59 PM · #2 |
H (pixels) / 150dpi = min. quality
W (pixels) / 150dpi = min. quality
H (pixels) / 300dpi = high quality
W (pixels) / 300dpi = high quality
example 20D:
3504 x 2336 would give you a 24"x16" min quality picture (150 dpi)
3504 x 2336 would give you a 12"x8" high quality picture (300 dpi)
you can enlarge the picture in steps of 5% to get a larger print and stop before pixilation.
Message edited by author 2006-08-25 18:59:03.
|
|
|
|
08/25/2006 07:00:56 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by Southern Gentleman:
H (pixels) / 150dpi = min. quality
W (pixels) / 150dpi = min. quality
H (pixels) / 300dpi = high quality
W (pixels) / 300dpi = high quality
example 20D:
3504 x 2336 would give you a 24"x16" min quality picture (150 dpi)
3504 x 2336 would give you a 12"x8" high quality picture (300 dpi)
you can enlarge the picture in steps of 5% to get a larger print and stop before pixilation. |
is there any way to make lerge printout without loosing the quality? some kind of photoshop trick or save as large format. |
|
|
|
08/25/2006 07:12:51 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by pgirish007:
is there any way to make lerge printout without loosing the quality? some kind of photoshop trick or save as large format. |
By resizing in PS. Goto Image and resize the picture by 5%. I use bi-cubic. But do it on your large image, before resizing for web.
|
|
|
|
08/25/2006 09:45:38 PM · #5 |
| I think Genuine Fractals is supposed to be good... was reccomended by alamy for upsizing their stock photos i think |
|
|
|
08/25/2006 10:19:12 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by diablo2097:
I think Genuine Fractals is supposed to be good... was reccomended by alamy for upsizing their stock photos i think |
I am sorry but what is "Genuine Fractals"? :) |
|
|
|
08/25/2006 10:22:37 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by pgirish007:
Originally posted by diablo2097:
I think Genuine Fractals is supposed to be good... was reccomended by alamy for upsizing their stock photos i think |
I am sorry but what is "Genuine Fractals"? :) |
Genuine Fractals |
|
|
|
08/25/2006 10:26:10 PM · #8 |
There is NO WAY to get details back if you have lost them (or never had them). Both Genuine Fractals and the 5% step method will enlarge images without introducing new artifacts but neither will recreate the sharp details that characterize what it considered to be a good image on either stock sites or DPC.
I have made very nice 11x14 prints of images from my first digital camera (under 1 megapixel) but these images look SOFT, just right for the current challenge. Fortunately, the soft look is appropriate for these images. I can't make 11x14 prints of images from this camera that are not appropriate for the soft look.
--DanW |
|
|
|
08/25/2006 11:26:56 PM · #9 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/07/2025 05:21:35 PM EDT.
