Author | Thread |
|
07/14/2006 02:26:07 PM · #51 |
I believe the rule is there to say 1 account per photographer - not 1 account per household.
There are parents and kids with separate accounts on the site too - but each must post under their own account. |
|
|
07/14/2006 02:27:27 PM · #52 |
A married couple, or a family where a mother/daughter (or whatever other combination) have separate accounts is not a multiple accounts situations.
Multiple accounts is when one and the same person opens more than one account. It doesn't even have to be the same computer, for example, if one person would have two accounts, one from home, one from work, it would be multiple accounts.
The other thing is if someone was banned from the site, then opened another account, that would be multiple accounts, and not right. |
|
|
07/14/2006 02:29:22 PM · #53 |
Originally posted by idnic: Originally posted by coolhar: Sooo... the message attached to the DQ'ed entries on the last page of challenge results could, in this case, be read as "banned person attempted to re-enter under a new identity, AND WAS CAUGHT TWICE." :-) |
Yeppers! Nailed it. |
I'm not sure where people are coming up with all this information. Did we say she tried to sneak in twice? As far as I know, this is untrue.
I just want everyone to know that we have not released ANY information on this, and ANYTHING that you read here, or in any other thread is speculation. Even if someone 'confirms' it...I wouldn't believe it. |
|
|
07/14/2006 02:31:00 PM · #54 |
Originally posted by HBunch: I'm not sure where people are coming up with all this information. Did we say she tried to sneak in twice? |
I think he was simply referring to the two DQ'd entries which were publically announced. |
|
|
07/14/2006 02:34:04 PM · #55 |
Don't post something that the SC doesn't want to be seen.
Besides having it edited you can have your post deleted altogether. |
|
|
07/14/2006 02:38:25 PM · #56 |
Originally posted by rswank: Don't post something that the SC doesn't want to be seen.
Besides having it edited you can have your post deleted altogether. |
SC is trying to maintain a level of maturity here. There's no profit to this endless bashing of individuals who seem to have "issues"; it makes us look cheap and vindictive. Anyway, Forum Rules state:
11: Do not attack other users. This includes "calling out" specific comments or commenters in a hostile manner. Personal attacks are never appropriate in a constructive discussion. If you disagree with another participant, address their points without attacking them personally. Be aware that others may have differing opinions of a personal attack, so use care when posting. Please note that this includes publicly "calling out" commenters (whether by name or not) in a hostile way.
12: Do not bait or provoke other users. This does not promote civil discussion and will not be tolerated.
R.
|
|
|
07/14/2006 02:40:12 PM · #57 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: Originally posted by rswank: Don't post something that the SC doesn't want to be seen.
Besides having it edited you can have your post deleted altogether. |
SC is trying to maintain a level of maturity here. There's no profit to this endless bashing of individuals who seem to have "issues"; it makes us look cheap and vindictive. Anyway, Forum Rules state:
11: Do not attack other users. This includes "calling out" specific comments or commenters in a hostile manner. Personal attacks are never appropriate in a constructive discussion. If you disagree with another participant, address their points without attacking them personally. Be aware that others may have differing opinions of a personal attack, so use care when posting. Please note that this includes publicly "calling out" commenters (whether by name or not) in a hostile way.
12: Do not bait or provoke other users. This does not promote civil discussion and will not be tolerated.
R. |
Thank you Bear...some people just don't get it. Even after being asked SEVERAL times to not accuse certain individuals when they do not have facts.
I think former members fall into this category as well. You have put very nicely what I wanted to say. Thank you. |
|
|
07/14/2006 02:43:08 PM · #58 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
11: Do not attack other users. This includes "calling out" specific comments or commenters in a hostile manner. Personal attacks are never appropriate in a constructive discussion. If you disagree with another participant, address their points without attacking them personally. Be aware that others may have differing opinions of a personal attack, so use care when posting. Please note that this includes publicly "calling out" commenters (whether by name or not) in a hostile way.
12: Do not bait or provoke other users. This does not promote civil discussion and will not be tolerated.
R. |
Posts are being edited and deleted that do not violate the above stated rules.
Rumors by definition need not be a bashfest.
Regardless, why would the above apply to the person in question anyways since they are no longer members of the site.
If I wanted to say George W Bush is a joke and embarrassment to America I am surely bashing him but do not think that this would get edited out since he is not a member. |
|
|
07/14/2006 02:47:45 PM · #59 |
Wht doesn't DPC lock the thread immediately after the initial post when it is nothing more than a notice of DQ. There is no need for any further discussion by anyone, it's just a notice. DPC should also not allow any other thread to start to by-pass this locked notice. Come-on guys and gals, what good is it to bash anyone for anything, that's the work of the SC's in confidentiality.
Lock all future DQ notification threads! |
|
|
07/14/2006 02:49:37 PM · #60 |
|
|
07/15/2006 09:11:58 PM · #61 |
Please note that the former 2nd place entry has been disqualified for removal of major elements. Congrats to Okieintx on her first ribbon! |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/10/2025 03:42:38 AM EDT.