| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/11/2006 12:54:19 AM · #26 |
| I like the new one much better, though I'd like to see what she is welding in exposure like the older one. The new pose and facial expression are much more edgy. Jeans work better for the picture too in my oppinion |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 12:55:15 AM · #27 |
I like the original. When I saw it, I was like "hey look it's a nude girl!" :)
And what about those goggles... ;-) |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 01:00:10 AM · #28 |
| On a slightly related sidenote, speaking of grinder girls and safety goggles, the grinder girl that is frequently on David Letterman doesn't wear safety goggles either...hmmmm.... |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 01:05:08 AM · #29 |
did you ruin another lens with sparks - or were you more careful this time?
I think the original looks better myself
|
|
|
|
07/11/2006 06:42:12 AM · #30 |
Originally posted by taterbug:
On a slightly related sidenote, speaking of grinder girls and safety goggles, the grinder girl that is frequently on David Letterman doesn't wear safety goggles either...hmmmm.... |
yeah, she may not wear goggles, but she doesn't stand a chance of being hot - hot like fire with or without them. She looks like a rescued crack whore or something. Can't believe she made it to national TV. I always hope one day she will grind right through her breast plate and bleed a bit for the viewers.
Is that mean? Not meant to be, just an opinion really.
Message edited by author 2006-07-11 06:42:50. |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 04:02:39 PM · #31 |
Both are really good shots. Choosing between the two I'd have to go with the original. I like the angle better and I also like that I can see what she is "working" on. I didn't think about it at first, but after a couple of comments on here it would be interesting to see the first one with pants. It might add a little more of the "working woman" feel to it. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
07/11/2006 04:11:16 PM · #32 |
I like them both for different reasons. I think the first one is a better pinup and the second one is a better "model" picture (if that makes sense).
The picture that really gets me though is this one 
The distortion that makes her hands look huge seems really cool to me for some reason. Like she's some kind of industrial worker mutant of some sort. (not mutant in the freak looking sort of way). |
|
|
|
07/11/2006 04:38:28 PM · #33 |
I like the new stuff. I think you're onto something! That "cartoony" look works great.
|
|
|
|
07/11/2006 11:43:50 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by Megatherian:
The picture that really gets me though is this one
The distortion that makes her hands look huge seems really cool to me for some reason. Like she's some kind of industrial worker mutant of some sort. (not mutant in the freak looking sort of way). |
LMAO... yeah... this is what female trolls look like :-)
|
|
|
|
07/12/2006 03:20:49 AM · #35 |
I like this one most:
Beautiful warm lighting. I also like the one that Megatherian picked out. The lighting you used somehow reminds me of the lighting you see a lot in paintings that are made in the Baroque.
Great job, Leroy. |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 06:10:11 AM · #36 |
No offense Leroy but I like the original MUCH better, just something about the models expression that works in that shot, like she is really concentrating and she is really selling me the idea that she indeed is normally working clothed like that. The retake is not bad at all, just not really working in my opinion, seems more forced and contrived somehow.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/17/2025 04:48:21 AM EDT.
