| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/27/2006 10:18:41 AM · #1 |
OK. I know if you are going to use pictures of someone (a model) in advertising, stock, or whatever, you need a model release (if only to cover your butt).
But what about with clients with whom you are only taking pictures for their use? For example, a family for whom you are doing studio portraits, or a couple for whom you are doing prom portraits. Would you need a model release for them? If yes, would a "short form" release work in this situation as well as a long and detailed release?
I'm not sureif I've asked this right, so if I get a lot of "huh?" 's in response, I'll try to rephrase. :)
Sara
|
|
|
|
06/27/2006 10:20:57 AM · #2 |
I have all of my portrait clients sign a contract which basically says I have the right to display their shots for purposes of my own advertising in my studio, office, website or other location as I need.
If I think there is any stock value in the shots I will have them sign a standard model release as well. |
|
|
|
06/27/2006 11:25:07 AM · #3 |
|
|
|
07/26/2006 07:07:56 PM · #4 |
| Laws are different. but I sopose you just put your brand on and let it be. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/05/2025 10:20:34 PM EDT.
