| Author | Thread |
|
|
04/26/2006 11:41:59 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by Rooster:
golive sucks, go with dreamweaver |
Yeah, it does kinda suck :-) I like dreamweaver myself.
|
|
|
|
04/26/2006 11:46:56 PM · #27 |
| dreamweaver is the best, but frontpage is SO user friendly. you can open each file in both, so it is an option for beginners |
|
|
|
04/26/2006 11:50:58 PM · #28 |
| did I mention that I am cheap? |
|
|
|
04/26/2006 11:55:18 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by Niten:
did I mention that I am cheap? |
Sorry, you asked for the best, not the cheapest... LOL
Microsoft Frontpage is probably the cheapest of any "real" WYSIWYG web production software and hands-down the mst user friendly.
|
|
|
|
04/27/2006 12:54:28 AM · #30 |
dreamweaver is not that hard to figure out. There are loads of tutes on the web. I learned all I know by myself. I'm somewhat of a tech geek, all self taught.
If you wanna create something you will like, then it's worth learning a good text editor program to do it, IMHO.
Cheapness is not an option on any level. :P
fotoman, I am 100% with you. Dreamweaver is the way to go. I've tried 'em all & it's the only one I still use.
|
|
|
|
04/27/2006 01:00:36 AM · #31 |
| I still prefer the #1 web page editor. "Wordpad." Works wonders and you don't need to worry about those silly WYSIWyGs. Also much easier to understand where problems are occuring. |
|
|
|
04/27/2006 01:22:32 AM · #32 |
| I used 1rst page 2000 before, how do the others compare to it feature wise? //www.evrsoft.com/ |
|
|
|
04/27/2006 10:49:13 AM · #33 |
Originally posted by robs:
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Originally posted by jhonan:
For layout, tables just *work*
CSS is for fonts, colours and borders - For layout CSS is guaranteed to drive you insane. |
You're no fun! ;^)
Actually, I use tables also but many times will nest the table inside a div tag. There are many choices with CSS - I find it a very helpful tool and quite flexible. |
LOL - CSS is certainly the way to go but the browser inconsistencies (mostly IE) and the 1/2 implementations between the versions of CSS just give you keyboard marks across the forehead from pounding you head with it. The talk is that IE7 will help a lot - so in a decade or two when everybody upgrades it should be better :).
Tables or even layers are easier to think about but less flexible then CSS - except in cases where CSS don't &%&^% work properly :-) |
Have you read JavaScript & DHTML Cookbook by Danny Goodman (O'Reilly publishing)? One of the most useful books I have in my library.
If you get it, check out Chapter 13, section 3, Controlling Postitioning Via a DHTML JavaScript Library. They have provided a library of API routines (DHTMLAPI.js) that is a great tool. Supports IE 4/Netscape 4 or later by using conditional statements, etc...
The ISBN: 0-596-00467-2
I agree with you in that coding for various browsers is a pain. Fortunately in most of my work the browser standard is currently set at IE 6. If a user has a complaint using a different browser...so sorry. ;^)
Message edited by author 2006-04-27 10:49:36. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/31/2025 03:57:27 PM EST.
