| Author | Thread |
|
|
04/14/2006 12:12:04 PM · #176 |
Originally posted by skiprow:
Originally posted by xianart:
Little interest here for me I'm afraid. Just **************** is what I get from it and I find nothing that speaks to me beyond that. I do like the tones and the dof, but as a candid and in what I like to see in them, this just doesn't do it for me. It's a 3 vote for me.
(edited to hide my image until voting is over). |
i got one from her, too, christian, but don't sweat it...i think she votes a 1-5 scale... |
yep ;) |
|
|
|
04/14/2006 12:23:06 PM · #177 |
| I got one too with the big 3 at the end of it ... sad some people feel the need to vote this way. |
|
|
|
04/14/2006 01:25:37 PM · #178 |
| Too many animals, homeless people and immigration march shots. Those are all over-played. Creativity will pull higher scores. Now, go be creative. |
|
|
|
04/14/2006 01:26:53 PM · #179 |
Just a reminder that calling people out in the forums because you did not appreciate a comment is not acceptable; see rule 11. If you feel a particular comment violates the site ToS, Please make the SC aware of it. We all get comments we don't like, and we need to develop thicker skins.
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 01:38:43 PM · #180 |
i didn't call the commenter out - there is no reference to the image or the name of the commenter. i was just wondering if i was being unrealiastic about my expectations.
i have nothing against negative comments, i have a fine art degree, i had public critiques, that's a part of life. what i'm wondering about is the subjectivity of scoring.
the comment violates nothing in the rules, all i'm hoping for here is some opinions on this. after a few days, i'll delete this posting, as i don't want the commenter identified.
edited because my son turned the computer off1
Message edited by author 2006-04-14 13:57:19.
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 01:55:11 PM · #181 |
i think kirbic was just speaking generally ... preventative maintenance
:)
Originally posted by xianart:
i didn't call the commenter out |
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 02:22:39 PM · #182 |
Got 4 great comments, hanging in around 5.6, just got a "1" with no comment...hmmmmmm...fine. Just take the time to justify that score so I can understand. I've learned people's opinions are so varried here that the bad will still always come with the good.
po-tay-toe , po-taa-toe , to-may-toe , to-maa-toe. IMHO I've decided to stay away from...
Message edited by author 2006-04-14 14:25:04.
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 02:58:14 PM · #183 |
OMG I have to post this while I can, I'm on a roll now!
Votes: 138
Views: 164
Avg Vote: 5.0000
Comments: 5
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 04/14/06 02:56 pm
People either love this shot or hate it. Proof is listed above. ;-)
Message edited by author 2006-04-14 14:59:32.
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 02:59:35 PM · #184 |
iguess i'm with you, i'm sitting on a 5.000, they either love it or hate it
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 06:16:36 PM · #185 |
actually the technical halfway point is 5.5, but who's counting?
so, i don't know how to break this to you, but you're tipping toward the "hate it" end of the scale. :P
just messin' with you...
Message edited by author 2006-04-14 18:17:08. |
|
|
|
04/14/2006 08:02:59 PM · #186 |
Votes: 155
Views: 218
Avg Vote: 6.0710
Comments: 11
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 04/14/06 07:51 pm
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 08:07:02 PM · #187 |
Originally posted by GIS_boy:
Votes: 155
Views: 218
Avg Vote: 6.0710
Comments: 11
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 04/14/06 07:51 pm |
Are you just doing the bare minimum to stay over a 6 average? :P
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 08:15:19 PM · #188 |
I will vote on the Candid111 score now - Just call me Troll. I will give 10's to all animal shots and 1's to all people shots.
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 08:24:06 PM · #189 |
Originally posted by yanko:
Are you just doing the bare minimum to stay over a 6 average? :P |
lol, actually I had high hopes for my photo but I have somehow offended a percentage of the voters and they are making me pay for it! ;-/
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 08:27:56 PM · #190 |
Originally posted by GIS_boy:
Originally posted by yanko:
Are you just doing the bare minimum to stay over a 6 average? :P |
lol, actually I had high hopes for my photo but I have somehow offended a percentage of the voters and they are making me pay for it! ;-/ |
Apparently my photo is morally wrong. Next time I will tell the subject to do it diferently - use a diferent tool - so that I can take a morally correct photo. I will also ask her to move to the outside so that I can shoot the photo with natural light - OH Yes, I will ask her to do the same the next morning as my original shot was at night.
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 08:35:54 PM · #191 |
Originally posted by marcellieb:
Originally posted by GIS_boy:
lol, actually I had high hopes for my photo but I have somehow offended a percentage of the voters and they are making me pay for it! ;-/ |
Apparently my photo is morally wrong. |
lolol, this is the exact comment I have recieved - Made me laugh, I got a lot out of this exercise and took hundreds of photos of subjects I would normally stay clear of.
It's been a great challenge for me despite the comments.
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 08:48:32 PM · #192 |
Originally posted by GIS_boy:
Originally posted by marcellieb:
Originally posted by GIS_boy:
lol, actually I had high hopes for my photo but I have somehow offended a percentage of the voters and they are making me pay for it! ;-/ |
Apparently my photo is morally wrong. |
lolol, this is the exact comment I have recieved - Made me laugh, I got a lot out of this exercise and took hundreds of photos of subjects I would normally stay clear of.
It's been a great challenge for me despite the comments. |
True - I like my entry - Did not offend me. Actualy, I do exactly the same. It is a definate candid. People actualy wanted to buy it from me - did not offend them either.
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 10:28:04 PM · #193 |
Votes: 143
Views: 181
Avg Vote: 5.1818
Comments: 3
mediocre, mediocre mediocre. ah well. candid shooting when a stay at home, mainly single mum, seems to be a hell of a lot more dificult than when i had no kids...
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 10:43:46 PM · #194 |
Had another moral issue comment - WOW, is there really people out there that see the devil around every corner. Although my photo is definately not one of the best, I think the whole thing was misunderstood and that definately cost me a 1 or 2 points.
I will definately PM all my Moral issue voters to set them str8. Wow, funny how some people see things. The vote on the morality and not the photo.
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 11:08:24 PM · #195 |
How can someone object on moral grounds to anything submit for a candid challenge?
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 11:11:43 PM · #196 |
Couple of years back a South African Photographer took a photo of a small child sitting on a gravel road. The child was naked and extremely thin - it was in some African Country that had some major hunger issues.
In the background was one or two vultures lurking - Very shocking picture. Photographer recieved a couple of Awards for this photo.
Surely there are more moral issues in a photo like that than there is in mine.
|
|
|
|
04/14/2006 11:17:25 PM · #197 |
Originally posted by marcellieb:
Couple of years back a South African Photographer took a photo of a small child sitting on a gravel road. The child was naked and extremely thin - it was in some African Country that had some major hunger issues.
In the background was one or two vultures lurking - Very shocking picture. Photographer recieved a couple of Awards for this photo.
Surely there are more moral issues in a photo like that than there is in mine. |
do you know who the photographer was? or the name of the photograph? |
|
|
|
04/14/2006 11:19:53 PM · #198 |
Originally posted by smyk:
Originally posted by marcellieb:
Couple of years back a South African Photographer took a photo of a small child sitting on a gravel road. The child was naked and extremely thin - it was in some African Country that had some major hunger issues.
In the background was one or two vultures lurking - Very shocking picture. Photographer recieved a couple of Awards for this photo.
Surely there are more moral issues in a photo like that than there is in mine. |
do you know who the photographer was? or the name of the photograph? |
Sorry, I can't. All I remember is the photo. VERY strong image and extremely sad. I get goosebumbs in my head thinking of it. Maybe one of the other South African DPC'ers will know.
|
|
|
|
04/15/2006 12:14:47 AM · #199 |
Originally posted by marcellieb:
Had another moral issue comment - WOW, is there really people out there that see the devil around every corner. Although my photo is definitely not one of the best, I think the whole thing was misunderstood and that definitely cost me 1 or 2 points.
I will definitely PM all my Moral issue voters to set them str8. Wow, funny how some people see things. The vote on the morality and not the photo. |
Yep, pretty annoying really. The really ironic thing about my photo is that I sat down and spoke to the subject for 10 minutes and then asked if I could take a photo. My subject was more than happy and I managed to offer the subject a few dollars without making it look like pity.
In all honesty I think our conversation and the few dollars I gave would have made the guys morning.
Funny that while I was there I didn't see any high moralled folk drop by for a convo. ;-)
|
|
|
|
04/15/2006 12:16:43 AM · #200 |
| just want to say that i enjoyed the candid entries. Many wonderful shots. I like the many slices of life displayed, the many peaceful/reflective moments and the real life situations. Just wonderful. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/04/2025 12:17:34 AM EST.
