| Author | Thread |
|
|
04/05/2006 04:45:31 AM · #1 |
HOPEFULLY I will receive this from my mom by next week. I had to have it shipped to her in Colorado and she is shipping it to me.
I wanted to do the team photo of my 4yr old's soccer team. Is the 10-22mm an appropriate lens to use or should I stick with my 24-70? I want to get as close as possible, but not sure if the 10-22mm would give me too much of a perspective distortion.
Thanks :)
|
|
|
|
04/05/2006 04:51:10 AM · #2 |
Hi-ho,
At the 22mm end it wouldn't be too bad, but at the 10 end there would be way to much distortion for a people photo at the edges of the image.
I'd be sticking to the 24-70 if it was me.
16mm (Equivalent) is real wide, but then you might like distorted kids. :-).
You might get away with it if you get the kids standing in a semi-circle in front of you, to minimize the distortion, but even then you'll get some odd effects I imagine,. The widest I go is 17mm (27 equiv) and even that is too wide for people at the edges of the frame if they're in a group IMHO.
Cheers, Me.
|
|
|
|
04/05/2006 05:04:08 AM · #3 |
Thank you :) I definitely don't want distorted kids....their parents would shoot me ;o)
|
|
|
|
04/05/2006 02:22:03 PM · #4 |
| Also if you get farther away, you might be able to shoot wide open and not have a distracting background behind the people, if there's trees or anything. |
|
|
|
04/05/2006 02:26:55 PM · #5 |
|
|
|
04/05/2006 03:19:59 PM · #6 |
It's too wide for group shots, period. At the 22mm end it will do OK, but stay away from the wide end. Unless, of course, that's the effect you're after...
R.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/24/2025 02:23:03 AM EDT.
