| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/03/2003 04:29:07 PM · #26 |
[quote=pitsaman]This is scaring me ,half of the people didn't saw face on[quote]
I saw the face it is a combination of shadows and depth of the bark! |
|
|
|
03/03/2003 04:42:19 PM · #27 |
| Ok, but i see lots of faces that look like that, i also see a wolf or a horse face.. |
|
|
|
03/03/2003 04:44:17 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by shutterfly:
Ok, but i see lots of faces that look like that, i also see a wolf or a horse face.. |
I see a nice rose on your belly :-) |
|
|
|
03/03/2003 04:53:28 PM · #29 |
|
|
|
03/03/2003 06:48:38 PM · #30 |
| Does anyone have a photo that might illustrate the naturally ocurring numbers? I don't have a clue... |
|
|
|
03/03/2003 07:38:02 PM · #31 |
|
|
|
03/03/2003 07:40:15 PM · #32 |
|
|
|
03/03/2003 07:44:03 PM · #33 |
| Should we expect to see a LOT of things depicting "11" and "1"? I hope we'll see a little more creativity on this - a 1 / 11 will probably be a cop-out as far as I'm concerned. Unless of course I choose to do it, too, which means it'll be nothing shy of genius. |
|
|
|
03/03/2003 08:42:11 PM · #34 |
Your photograph should include a naturally occurring (not manufactured in any way) number.
This is just not clear to me. I must be really dense today.
Maybe tomorrow I'll have that little lightbulb over my head. :{} |
|
|
|
03/03/2003 09:00:28 PM · #35 |
I think branches of a tree that might form a seven would work. Circles making a zero, or a snail that might look like a six??
This is certainly a tough challenge, and hope my ideas above would fit?!
|
|
|
|
03/03/2003 09:04:46 PM · #36 |
Here is an eight maybe??
|
|
|
|
03/03/2003 09:05:10 PM · #37 |
Originally posted by pitsaman:
Originally posted by shutterfly:
Ok, but i see lots of faces that look like that, i also see a wolf or a horse face.. |
I see a nice rose on your belly :-) |
oh...thats not mine, wish it was. |
|
|
|
03/03/2003 09:57:19 PM · #38 |
Originally posted by justine:
Your photograph should include a naturally occurring (not manufactured in any way) number.
This is just not clear to me. I must be really dense today.
Maybe tomorrow I'll have that little lightbulb over my head. :{} |
It makes sense to me: The picture should be of something that is/was NOT specfically created by a human to look like or resemble a number. So a picture of a hedge that has been cut specifically to look like a number is not a valid pic because it was cut to look like a number on purpose. That's all this means.
The example of the pipes above that supposedely looks like a four is valid in my opinion because it was clearly not meant to look like a Four (nor does it resemble one), it's just a bad plumber at work. :D
This is going to be VERY hard! Can't wait to see what people find for this! You'll need to be critical during voting to weed out anything that appears to be "minipulated" into looking like a number. :)
|
|
|
|
03/03/2003 11:56:44 PM · #39 |
Originally posted by Konador:
Originally posted by jjbeguin:
would this qualify as 411?
|
I'd say yes, but it isnt natural. |
Why isn't that "naturally occurring"? I would say it is.. I don't think the plumber thought to make the pipes into the number 4. I took the description to mean no numbers in the readily recognized way. ... ex. on signs, doors, text.. etc.
|
|
|
|
03/04/2003 05:26:07 AM · #40 |
I started worrying when someone asked us to find the shape of a face in the tree. I could see the arms and legs too???
Rainbow
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/29/2025 01:05:02 PM EDT.
