Author | Thread |
|
03/28/2006 09:34:53 PM · #26 |
Yep, I just changed the title again. At this point, I have changed the title on the entry as many times as I changed the entry itself. |
|
|
03/28/2006 09:51:11 PM · #27 |
Abstract titles could be adjectives, a descriptive word or two... |
|
|
03/28/2006 09:56:19 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by saracat: Umm, what would be an 'abstract title'? |
Literal title: "Dog Poop at Sunset"
Abstract title: "pupquake"
glad to be of service...
R.
|
|
|
03/28/2006 10:11:24 PM · #29 |
|
|
03/28/2006 10:29:41 PM · #30 |
just reshot mine another 20times...
aaaghh..
|
|
|
03/28/2006 10:35:04 PM · #31 |
did mine in half an hour with no idea before walking around the house looking for things that looked interesting. Usually you pay when you do it that way. |
|
|
03/28/2006 10:43:11 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by kyebosh: did mine in half an hour with no idea before walking around the house looking for things that looked interesting. Usually you pay when you do it that way. |
You may be surprised. Many times the spontaneity of this technique really comes through in the image, and it does amazingly well.
Its not a picture of a toilet, is it? I hope none of those show up, but I suppose there isn't much on a toilet that could lend itself to macros, unless it hasn't been cleaned for awhile (Yuk) |
|
|
03/28/2006 10:47:26 PM · #33 |
Originally posted by kyebosh: did mine in half an hour with no idea before walking around the house looking for things that looked interesting. Usually you pay when you do it that way. |
That's what I did. Not an idea in my poor head. Walked around looking today, in the house. Bingo! Nice entry! (I think...)
R.
|
|
|
03/28/2006 10:49:33 PM · #34 |
I'm lucky that my family collects odd junk. :-) I think (once again probably to be proven wrong) that I have a good chance with this one.
|
|
|
03/28/2006 10:52:40 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever: I'm lucky that my family collects odd junk. :-) I think (once again probably to be proven wrong) that I have a good chance with this one. |
I most certainly wish you the best of luck, but for some reason I get a little scared when thinking about a Macro and what you may do with it. :) |
|
|
03/28/2006 10:53:17 PM · #36 |
Mines in. Family members seem to like it.
We'll see if it's DPC material. |
|
|
03/28/2006 10:54:13 PM · #37 |
Well against my better judgement I entered one. I know its not DPCish, but Im entering it because I like it:P It will either score high or low, But it is cool:)
|
|
|
03/28/2006 10:54:46 PM · #38 |
Originally posted by Riggs: I most certainly wish you the best of luck, but for some reason I get a little scared when thinking about a Macro and what you may do with it. :) |
Well, if it's Abstract then perhaps you will never know ;-)
|
|
|
03/28/2006 11:14:59 PM · #39 |
damn mine is so abstract.... well it's abstract! |
|
|
03/28/2006 11:22:29 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by Rikki: damn mine is so abstract.... well it's abstract! |
Kinda matches your thought processes, huh? :-P
|
|
|
03/28/2006 11:36:07 PM · #41 |
I just changed my entry from typical flower macro to some thing unusual. Here are the entries I withdrawn.
I am glad that I withdrawn these. They really suck. I have a question. I used 17-85 lense. Can this lense be used for macros or I need to buy a new one? Does macro filter help?
Message edited by author 2006-03-28 23:40:15. |
|
|
03/28/2006 11:41:13 PM · #42 |
Hey I'm in at the last second. Last time this happen the results weren't so good but I think this time might be different. If not I'm gonna to have to kill some people. :) |
|
|
03/28/2006 11:49:01 PM · #43 |
I withdrew this earlier in the week--think I made a good decision?
|
|
|
03/28/2006 11:54:13 PM · #44 |
|
|
03/28/2006 11:55:07 PM · #45 |
LOL
That was pretty straightforward. That's good. |
|
|
03/28/2006 11:58:44 PM · #46 |
Heres to over 6 with mine...
It does have cowbell, not like that always helps:P
|
|
|
03/29/2006 09:36:20 AM · #47 |
Most of the entries I checked out weren't very abstract...and many of them weren't very macro either. What's up with people? I would say on 80-90% I could immediately tell what they were. |
|
|
03/29/2006 09:38:52 AM · #48 |
Originally posted by moheeb: Most of the entries I checked out weren't very abstract...and many of them weren't very macro either. What's up with people? I would say on 80-90% I could immediately tell what they were. |
Didn't you hear? We don't have to meet the challenge description anymore. It's just a suggestion.
Shoot what you want and enter it in. Everything's a free study. |
|
|
03/29/2006 09:41:43 AM · #49 |
Originally posted by moheeb: Most of the entries I checked out weren't very abstract...and many of them weren't very macro either. What's up with people? I would say on 80-90% I could immediately tell what they were. |
You wont be able to tell what my image is. It was taken from a foot away wide angle and I did only use a portion of the image. In focus and very abstract, yet my scores do suck. I guess I need not to have been that abstract. |
|
|
03/29/2006 09:45:01 AM · #50 |
Originally posted by shaileshivyas:
I have a question. I used 17-85 lense. Can this lense be used for macros or I need to buy a new one? Does macro filter help? |
Any Help? |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/24/2025 03:56:34 PM EDT.