Author | Thread |
|
03/09/2006 03:28:17 PM · #1 |
Canon 28-105 F/3.5 or Tamron 24-135mm?
Well, the subject says it all.
Which do you suggest and why?
Just for clarification: this is the Canon 28-105 f/3.5 and NOT the f/4-something
Message edited by author 2006-03-09 15:29:24. |
|
|
03/09/2006 03:41:48 PM · #2 |
24-135 has much better range and is sharper than the 28-105 3.5-4.5. I would recommend the Tamron 28-75 over both of these though (I had all of them and kept this one because it's fantastic). |
|
|
03/10/2006 12:21:54 AM · #3 |
I have the tamron 24-135 and LOVE it. What do you want to know? get it, that's all you need to know!
|
|
|
03/10/2006 12:27:50 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by Prof_Fate: I have the tamron 24-135 and LOVE it. What do you want to know? get it, that's all you need to know! |
Is it that good? wow! Im off to get it! Im considering getting the 30D while I give my 350 to my fiance. So I'll be upgrading just like you prof! :) 30D + Tam 24-135, great combo, huh? |
|
|
03/10/2006 12:45:55 PM · #5 |
I have the lens...i'll have the 30D - as soon as they release the bloddy thing.
In the meantime i'm buying other things in the name of the 'business'. strobes, books...
I already got the strap for hte 30D, so i have to get the camera!
(op/tech pro strap - go get one and throw away that POS that comes with the camera)
reviews of it at fredmiranda
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/23/2025 10:24:47 AM EDT.