| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/08/2006 10:57:30 PM · #1 |
Just wanting to gauge some opinions on something I find unusual (not to mention a tad unsettling) in regards to some comments I have received as well as my photography-buddy, GIS_boy. They have been received by a particular registered user who has only ever made 3 comments - and (coincidentally....or not) have been made on one of my images and two of GIS_boys. Only one vote cast, which was a ten apparently (going by the comment on my image) and, perhaps the most disconcerting is the comment that was left on GIS_boy's photo which used my sister as the model which was "Hot body must be a yummy mummy", which was the below submission to Painting with Light II:
Does anyone have any advice on the best way of handling this? Or am I just being paranoid....... |
|
|
|
03/08/2006 11:10:03 PM · #2 |
Originally posted by manic35:
...Does anyone have any advice on the best way of handling this? Or am I just being paranoid....... |
I'd ignore it the way I'd ignore the noise of a dirt bike or a chopper after climbing a mountain. There are so many of them, and my argument cannot find an ear either. |
|
|
|
03/08/2006 11:13:59 PM · #3 |
he is not a stalker.
a photo like that would surely evoke sexual feelings in certain individuals, whether you like it or not. And I dont find his comment vulgar or nasty. More like expressing what he felt when he saw the photo? |
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:14:49 PM · #4 |
is this a duplicate thread type thingy?
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:16:37 PM · #5 |
The butler did it... Butt-ler ;-) ohhh, nevermind...
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:17:53 PM · #6 |
The other thread was locked, as it had pretty much become an off-topic meander.
To the OP: The SC has opened a discussion on this. The information we have indicates that the Cushla account may be owned by someone logging in from the same computer(s) that you use. I'd check that out. Please open a ticket if you wish to exchange information about this without hashing it out in the public forums.
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:18:07 PM · #7 |
If the comment offends you so much just report the post and be done with it. No need to start 2 threads to see if anyone else is offended.
...my 2 cents...
Edit: Ack Kirbic beat me to it.
Message edited by author 2006-03-09 14:19:28.
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:18:44 PM · #8 |
Manic - SC already said that the commenter was from your own IP address. So why not just ask hubby if he has a second account and then thank him for the compliment?
Message edited by author 2006-03-09 14:19:01.
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:20:49 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by manic35:
Just wanting to gauge some opinions on something I find unusual (not to mention a tad unsettling) in regards to some comments I have received as well as my photography-buddy, GIS_boy. They have been received by a particular registered user who has only ever made 3 comments - and (coincidentally....or not) have been made on one of my images and two of GIS_boys. Only one vote cast, which was a ten apparently (going by the comment on my image) and, perhaps the most disconcerting is the comment that was left on GIS_boy's photo which used my sister as the model which was "Hot body must be a yummy mummy", which was the below submission to Painting with Light II:
Does anyone have any advice on the best way of handling this? Or am I just being paranoid....... |
I don't know why there are two threads on this, but let me answer. I have no problems with it.
1. According to SC the actual comment came from your own computer. I would suggest maybe taking that into consideration and making your first investigation begin where the cops would begin - in the home.
2. Maybe if you are afraid of posting nude photos, as the photo has since been admittedly of yourself and NOT your sister, then don't pose nude. This may avoid lewd comments in the future.
Just my two-dah-lahs
Rose
EDITED TO ADD: My comments were written at the same time as council. Take their advice.
Message edited by author 2006-03-09 14:22:18. |
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:21:52 PM · #10 |
Can we please continue the OT discussion? Pretty plizzzzzz?
Well I was actually just lurking but you know...
Message edited by author 2006-03-09 14:25:58.
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:22:34 PM · #11 |
| I suggest people look at the time this thread was started and realize that this thread was posted FIRST. |
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:31:04 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
I suggest people look at the time this thread was started and realize that this thread was posted FIRST. |
yeah - so? Why the two threads at all?
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:32:01 PM · #13 |
lets try to stay on topic this time, mmmkay? :)
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:34:10 PM · #14 |
| I mention it because certain people are repeating themselves as though she opened a second thread to get more information... |
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:38:27 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by kirbic:
... The SC has opened a discussion on this. The information we have indicates that the Cushla account may be owned by someone logging in from the same computer(s) that you use. I'd check that out. Please open a ticket if you wish to exchange information about this without hashing it out in the public forums. |
Just out of curiousity, if it hasn't already been checked, are there any other accounts with that same IP (other than the 3 already mentioned)?
David
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:39:18 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by frisca:
lets try to stay on topic this time, mmmkay? :) |
I don't know how that is possible. The question asked by the OP has been beat to death in the other thread, along with various other side tracks. Not much to discuss anymore that is in line with the original post. I say lock this one also until the clock rolls around a bit more in the OP's location.
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:40:04 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Originally posted by frisca:
lets try to stay on topic this time, mmmkay? :) |
I don't know how that is possible. The question asked by the OP has been beat to death in the other thread, along with various other side tracks. Not much to discuss anymore that is in line with the original post. I say lock this one also until the clock rolls around a bit more in the OP's location. |
I second that motion! |
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:41:04 PM · #18 |
well alllllrighty then! I thought this thread had worn out its usefulness as well...but I was open to letting the people speak!
|
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:41:18 PM · #19 |
| Hmmmm, this is starting to remind me of that babysitter movie that was just recently out. |
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:41:36 PM · #20 |
|
|
|
03/09/2006 02:43:12 PM · #21 |
A possibility:
Are you using a wireless network or internet router in your home?
Have you secured and encrypted it? If not, there is a possibility that someone nearby can use your connection and possibly (depending on your setup) get access to your computer(s).
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/25/2025 02:31:27 PM EDT.
