DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> Tokina 12-24 or Sigma 10-20
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 5 of 5, (reverse)
AuthorThread
03/07/2006 12:04:39 AM · #1
Does anybody have any experience with any of these two lenses?

I did a quick test run with the Sigma the other day at the store and I really liked it.. I even like the fact that it's 10 vs 12.. but I don't know much about the Tokina and I just became aware of it so I figured I should check it out before I decide on one.

(Ideally I would love the Canon one, but it seems a bit too pricey for me right now)

Javier
03/07/2006 12:15:41 AM · #2


Sigma 10-20mm (all at 10mm). No complaints so far.
03/07/2006 12:24:51 AM · #3
I have the Sigma 10-20. Before I go any further, have a read of this comparison between Sigma, Tokina, Tamron, and Nikon ultra-wides, this will give you a good idea of their respective strengths and weaknesses.
//www.nikonians.org/html/resources/nikon_articles/nikkor/af/wide_angles_shootout/index.html

If you choose to buy the Sigma, make sure that you buy it from a brick and mortar store. It is notorious for having large sample variation: you *may* need to go through a few of them before you score a good copy. My copy of Sigma is much softer in the right side of the frame, and I am in the process of getting it swapped or repaired. More reading here:
//forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1030&message=17442121
Once you land a good copy of the lens, you are likely to be very happy with it.

Hope this helps.

Message edited by author 2006-03-07 00:26:05.
03/07/2006 01:40:44 AM · #4
The tokina is better and faster and constant aperture. the sigma (and the tamron 11-18SP) are slow.

sample tokina 12-24 images
//i.pbase.com/g3/77/624677/2/56316687.2W_7124.jpg
//i.pbase.com/o4/77/624677/1/56311519.W_7122.jpg
//i.pbase.com/o4/77/624677/1/56316683.2W_7100copy.jpg


03/07/2006 02:09:36 AM · #5
Originally posted by Prof_Fate:

The tokina is better and faster and constant aperture. the sigma (and the tamron 11-18SP) are slow.


For an ultrawide it does not matter in most circumstances. At 10-20mm you can hand-hold in most low-light conditions. And for landscape shots you'll be stopping the lens down to f/8 - f/11 in any case. Constant f/4 of the Tokina is a nice thing, but only a very small advantage in my opinion. Besides they are slower than Tokina only on the long end.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/23/2025 06:27:53 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/23/2025 06:27:53 PM EDT.