| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/05/2006 04:55:16 AM · #1 |
hi all,
i was wondering if someone uses some cheap (Cullman Alpha, Vanguard ST 126) tripod for EOS 350D style camera ? is it okay or shoud i buy something like Manfrotto 55PROB ?
thanks for any hint
peace,
goran
|
|
|
|
03/05/2006 05:04:33 AM · #2 |
| I have one of those cheapie, but mine really is too flimsy. Am currently in the market for a good tripod, and I think this time that I will not skimp. |
|
|
|
03/05/2006 05:14:44 AM · #3 |
| I got a cheapo at Best Buy and it's nice and sturdy. |
|
|
|
03/05/2006 05:19:24 AM · #4 |
Hi-ho,
I've got a couple of Velbon CX440 tripods which I got for $50 NZ (About $29 US) which are OK for the 20D + light lens. I use an old Bogen which is far more stable for heavy glass..
The real issue with your 350D will be the weight of the lens you're using, not the camera itself, asside from having the basic security of knowing it's not going to fall over that is!
The 'off center' weight of the lens hanging out front is what causes problems for flimsy/cheap tripods.
Cheers, Me.
|
|
|
|
03/05/2006 05:31:17 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by KiwiChris:
The 'off center' weight of the lens hanging out front is what causes problems for flimsy/cheap tripods. |
okay ... thanks, but how is the issue you mentioned compensated on better/more expensive tripods ?
|
|
|
|
03/05/2006 06:13:18 AM · #6 |
My old Tokina 70-200mm had a mounting ring on the lens so the whole rig was perfectly balanced. I understand that digi lenses don't do that?
Brett
|
|
|
|
03/05/2006 06:17:55 AM · #7 |
I got a Cullman 6000 series medium weight tripod with a 3 pan head and a trigger ball and socket head as well - all half price at a show! The tripod is heavy and sturdy and the heads are OK so far. The tripod is full size too, so I dont bend down when I need to take a pic and the arm is reversible.
I wanted a Manfrotto 190Pro but the price was - ummm - interesting when I have other stuff I need.
Carl |
|
|
|
03/05/2006 07:54:09 AM · #8 |
you use a tripod for staibilty. for the best stability, you want it heavy with large diameter lengs, and tall enough that you do not have to extend the center pole for 99% of photos.
search ebay for AT828 from amvona. I got mine for $68 including the shipping. Very similar to a bogen 3021.
|
|
|
|
03/05/2006 08:06:13 AM · #9 |
I have a couple of tripods now, One is cheap and the other is very decent.
Having taken a few shots with it (I only finished building it last thursday, see my Pano equipment that won't break the bank thread in Hardware), I can tell you that it's rather a different experience altogether.
If you get a decent set of legs, you can also load the weight more.
I wouldn't be afraid to use my cheapie tripod with my as yet unpurchased 20d/30d and my 80-200 lens, but I would definitely add some weight.
If things got heavier (battery grip, flash, heavier lens), I'd stick with a serious tripod.
On the other hand, now that I have a decent tripod, I think I will be using my cheapie tripod primarily for an external flash stand. There is just no reason not to use it. It's superior in every way.
What's really surprising is how cheap you can get a decent tripod.
The AT828 that Prof Fate mentioned is really decent. Just make sure it's sturdy and rigid and you will be fine.
I recommend the Giottos 1001 or 1002 head. Light, strong and cheap, but great feel and excellent build quality.
Message edited by author 2006-03-05 08:09:20. |
|
|
|
03/06/2006 10:52:06 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by Prof_Fate:
you use a tripod for staibilty. for the best stability, you want it heavy with large diameter lengs, and tall enough that you do not have to extend the center pole for 99% of photos.
search ebay for AT828 from amvona. I got mine for $68 including the shipping. Very similar to a bogen 3021. |
I have the same one (the DynaTran AT-828) from Amvona on eBay ... got mine at $71 shipped. AT-828 on eBay
It's unbeatable at that price, IMHO. It is rock solid, easy to use, and is the perfect height without extending the center column (I'm 5'10"). The grip-action ball/pan head and quick-release plate are very easy to use and seems strong enough.
Not the one you'd want to go hiking with, but not overly heavy either. I will probably get a monopod to use when this one just isn't practical.
Message edited by author 2006-03-06 10:53:55. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/23/2025 11:42:58 AM EDT.
