Author | Thread |
|
03/01/2006 10:53:59 AM · #76 |
Originally posted by Jono: [Is it obvious that you've lit your scene with something other than a flash (ie your moving flashlight), or does it just look like it was lit with 'speckled moonlight filtering through a tree canopy' kind of thing? |
I would think its obvious enough as the most important areas of the image are lighted more and the less important areas are lighted less - its not random.
|
|
|
03/01/2006 10:56:31 AM · #77 |
Originally posted by idnic: I would think its obvious enough as the most important areas of the image are lighted more and the less important areas are lighted less - its not random. |
Well, I guess you're suffering at the hands of the more pedantic voter then, who's looking for a literal representation of "painting with light"?
I thought my picture was pretty good, and it's hovering around the mid 5.5's at the moment. :-( |
|
|
03/01/2006 10:58:33 AM · #78 |
Originally posted by Jono: I thought my picture was pretty good, and it's hovering around the mid 5.5's at the moment. :-( |
Ha! I'd be pleased with a 5.5 right now. This is a travesty!! 4.6308
|
|
|
03/01/2006 11:10:09 AM · #79 |
Votes: 73
Views: 157
Avg Vote: How do I do one of those smileys?
Comments: 9
Favorites: 1
|
|
|
03/01/2006 11:27:36 AM · #80 |
If you do not have a bunch of squiggles, an overt outline, or a paintbrush in your shot - then your non-stationary light source is 'not apparent'. Oh ye of narrow interpretation. What a drag. |
|
|
03/01/2006 11:37:20 AM · #81 |
My image really looks like a computer screen shot, but it's not.
Should I have mentioned this in the title?
How are explanations in the title received by the group?
Thanks |
|
|
03/01/2006 11:39:02 AM · #82 |
Originally posted by meanwile: If you do not have a bunch of squiggles, an overt outline, or a paintbrush in your shot - then your non-stationary light source is 'not apparent'. Oh ye of narrow interpretation. What a drag. |
I have all of those in my image and it's still bombing! |
|
|
03/01/2006 11:44:05 AM · #83 |
Votes: 67
Views: 91
Avg Vote: 5.6418
Comments: 1
a lot of outtakes ... still not REAL happy with the final submitted but is still higher than my average |
|
|
03/01/2006 12:52:14 PM · #84 |
Stats: You have rated 116 of 188 images (62%) in this challenge.
You have commented on 91 images (48%) in this challenge.
this is exhausting!
|
|
|
03/01/2006 02:45:12 PM · #85 |
Votes: 90
Views: 206
Avg Vote:
Comments: 9
Favorites: 1
Wish Lists: 0
Come on, there must be other people doing well out there... |
|
|
03/01/2006 02:55:35 PM · #86 |
Votes: 91
Views: 134
Avg Vote: ?.???? B-Þ
Comments: 11
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 03/01/06 02:52 pm
|
|
|
03/01/2006 03:14:49 PM · #87 |
Votes: 91
Views: 151
Avg Vote: 6.0879
Comments: 7
Favorites: 0
Came back up pretty good so far. Hope it can keep climbing. :) |
|
|
03/01/2006 03:35:58 PM · #88 |
Hey stop showing off that damn banana Achoo! |
|
|
03/01/2006 04:09:32 PM · #89 |
dang, I did it once! :) Laine loves it and asks to see the banana, so it will now be my official icon just like your blue smiley with the cheese-eating grin.
nyah! |
|
|
03/01/2006 04:11:21 PM · #90 |
|
|
03/01/2006 04:15:35 PM · #91 |
Originally posted by Rikki:  |
Hehehe...now that is what I want to do to the commenter who claimed I used a stationary light source. I wish!!! It would have been so much easier...oh well. Another week bummed simply because people don't believe that you used the correct technique for the challenge. |
|
|
03/01/2006 04:16:34 PM · #92 |
Votes: 89
Views: 144
Avg Vote: 5.0000
Comments: 2
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 03/01/06 04:10 pm
Holy Frito and the Corn Chips, I'm at 5.0 for the first time ever! I may want to send this to PDF before it drops to 3.5 or something. |
|
|
03/01/2006 04:25:18 PM · #93 |
Originally posted by idnic: Votes: 48
Views: 62
Avg Vote: 4.7917
Comments: 0
WTF?!?!?!?!?! Are you kidding? This is wrong on so many levels. The shot is lovely, crisp, technically sound, well composed, AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG! |
No Lexi?
*off to find persimmons* |
|
|
03/01/2006 04:48:41 PM · #94 |
Originally posted by Judi: Originally posted by Rikki:  |
Hehehe...now that is what I want to do to the commenter who claimed I used a stationary light source. I wish!!! It would have been so much easier...oh well. Another week bummed simply because people don't believe that you used the correct technique for the challenge. |
The best thing is, i did use a stationary light source... and you'll never know which photo to mark down now! Muhahahaha!
disclaimer: i might not have done...
|
|
|
03/01/2006 07:33:23 PM · #95 |
Well, just got hit with one of the necessary 1-scores. It never feels good. Have dropped .13 in the last 13 votes. |
|
|
03/01/2006 10:16:47 PM · #96 |
Votes: 119
Views: 207
Avg Vote: 5.9076
Comments: 6
i'd really like a 6+ score....could maybe some of you send some 9s and 10s my way? :) |
|
|
03/01/2006 10:22:42 PM · #97 |
Originally posted by alfresco:
No Lexi?
*off to find persimmons* |
Ha! Good luck! I'm off to DRINK HEAVILY!! :P
|
|
|
03/02/2006 12:08:13 AM · #98 |
Votes: 118
Views: 154
Avg Vote: 4.9576
Comments: 3
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Heading south..I hope it's low scoring challenge.... |
|
|
03/02/2006 02:52:15 AM · #99 |
24 HOUR SCORE UPDATE:
My score is still moving around a bit but starting to stabilise.
Votes: 130
Views: 258
Avg Vote: 6.7538
Comments: 9
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 03/02/06 02:50 am
Cheers Matt
|
|
|
03/02/2006 03:01:44 AM · #100 |
Just been looking at the images and congrats to all the creative people who have done some very fine work.
I'm looking forward to voting on this one. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 05/18/2025 06:16:48 PM EDT.