Author | Thread |
|
02/22/2006 01:14:52 AM · #26 |
Originally posted by MadMan2k: Thanks for the link. That's cool that it's the same thing.. wonder what Canon thinks about that? haha
I'll probably get that one, more money to go towards a fisheye :) |
Hmmm, I've a Sigma 15mm fisheye, and I don't like it on my XT. On the N, the fish gives great distortion effects that makes for dramatic shots.
On a XT, it just give distortions. Not as good. I'd recommend an ultrawide instead.
As for the Optek grip, I think Canon's profit margin is so big that they don't care. I think they rely on blind loyalty and fear of the "after market" equipment too much. But that's just my view.
|
|
|
02/22/2006 01:15:16 AM · #27 |
.
Message edited by author 2006-02-22 01:16:04. |
|
|
02/22/2006 01:21:05 AM · #28 |
I was going to get the manual focus Peleng 8mm from Kiev Camera to start out, and if I like it buy a real one.
It's mainly for effect... although I agree a 10-22 would be very nice to have |
|
|
02/22/2006 01:32:06 AM · #29 |
Hmmm, a 8mm fish would really distort and cause vingetting even in a cropped sensor. This would really be for special effect purposes, unless you digitally defish.
Have you seen a review of it on photozone.de? It's a good review.
|
|
|
02/22/2006 01:39:00 AM · #30 |
About the review, do you mean of the 10-22? I have read reviews on that one, sounds nice. Pretty expensive though.
There's a few people on here that have that 8mm and I like their work with it, hopefully I can come close. |
|
|
02/22/2006 01:51:04 AM · #31 |
Nope,
the peleng is reviewed also.
If I got an ultrawide, I'd get the Sigma 10-20, cheapest and the sharpest according to photozone.de
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/23/2025 04:57:45 PM EDT.