| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/17/2006 12:29:47 PM · #1 |
|
|
|
02/17/2006 12:40:58 PM · #2 |
| If they're as good as some other Tamron offerings, they'll be popular. Too bad no MSRPs. |
|
|
|
02/17/2006 12:42:30 PM · #3 |
| They list MSRP on the actual product website...the 17-50 is listed at ~$750 which is less than the 17-35 MSRP so street price will probably be around $400 or so. This lens looks like it's going to be awesome since it's a derivative of the 28-75 XR. If only I weren't so happy with my 19-35. |
|
|
|
02/17/2006 12:59:18 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by cresus:
They list MSRP on the actual product website...the 17-50 is listed at ~$750 which is less than the 17-35 MSRP so street price will probably be around $400 or so. This lens looks like it's going to be awesome since it's a derivative of the 28-75 XR. If only I weren't so happy with my 19-35. |
If it performs as well as the 28-75 then I think it will be some serious competition for the 17-40L (I know it's f4 but it's more expensive then that estimated street price and a stop faster). |
|
|
|
02/17/2006 01:05:44 PM · #5 |
If the 28-200 is as good as the 18-200mm Tamron I have it should be great. I have the 18-200mm F/3.5-6/3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) macro. And it takes great shots.
I just purchased the 28-75mm F/2.8 so I may be selling the 18-200 to get a very wide angle lens.
Message edited by author 2006-02-17 13:06:07.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/23/2025 05:09:02 PM EDT.
