How could someone do such a thing??????

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX Aspherical DF for Nikon

01/26/2006 01:34:49 AM · #26

You know, "Frisca" or whoever voted to close that thread, the one post of the URL by dassilem in that thread really isn't enough in my opinion, to call the poster or all of the supporters, liars. That seems wrong to me.

I think DPC is giving too much power to people who think they know what they are talking about and free rain to pass judgement, close threads, and to call other users scammers. Please.. if you have more information then I for one would like to hear it! But if you don't, then stop the BS control freak garbage because you are ruining the community.

-Chris.

Apple iPhone

01/26/2006 01:38:47 AM · #27

What are you talking about??
the other thing is... it was looked into ... the only man who died when and where "jordan" supposedly did was a 68 yr old married man...

you look into it also her old nick was crazycrystal77 you can find enough through googling her...

Originally posted by ChrisW123:

Message edited by author 2006-01-26 01:40:30.

GeneralE

Canon PowerShot S3 IS

Canon 12x IS USM (S3 IS built-in Lens) -- 36-432mm (35mm EQ)

01/26/2006 01:42:04 AM · #28

When someone gets busted for shoplifting, does the store management assemble all of the other customers and let them decide the alleged perpetrator's fate?

Why are y'all talking about this at all right now, in this place?

DjFenzl

01/26/2006 01:44:48 AM · #29

Originally posted by GeneralE:

because the "shoplifter" came back in the store and demanded an apology from all the customers.

Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di for Pentax

01/26/2006 01:50:26 AM · #30

Originally posted by Di:

OK Di, good detective work, you will probably have a future career in dective work because of these findings.. Who gives a flying f___ in any case? I saw ONE url post to a website in the original post. Does this really matter even if we are going to assume they are guilty of lying? No. But what if they are NOT guilty?? Don't you think that the harm in that case would be 10 times worse them the "benefit" they may have gotten otherwise?

Message edited by author 2006-01-26 01:53:01.

Artyste

Sony Ericsson W810i

01/26/2006 01:54:05 AM · #31

Originally posted by ChrisW123:

[quote=Di] What are you talking about??
the other thing is... it was looked into ... the only man who died when and where "jordan" supposedly did was a 68 yr old married man...

you look into it also her old nick was crazycrystal77 you can find enough through googling her...

OK Di, good detective work, you will probably have a future career in dective work because of these findings.. Who gives a flying f___ in any case? I saw ONE url post to a website in the original post. Does this really matter even if we are going to assume they are guilty of lying? No. But what if they are NOT guilty?? Don't you think that the harm in that case would be 10 times worse the "benefit" they may getting otherwise?

I would personally rather assume the SC has done their homework and have a very valid reason for not only a) locking the thread, but b) keeping it from the rest of DPC. Personally, I don't care to know the sordid details, it's enough to know that my interests are being protected. Something red-lighted that post and it seems like an investigation was given and something warranted it being shut down.

Good enough for me.

Anything else would just be rubbernecking and drama hounding.

01/26/2006 01:54:50 AM · #32

Just because some people only saw one URL doesn't mean other people have only seen one URL.

And don't forget the harm caused when people find out they've been played for fools on the internets with a few clever tugs at the ol' heartstrings... that'll destroy your faith in people real fast.

01/26/2006 01:59:44 AM · #33

Originally posted by Artyste:

Hahahaha, spoken like a good kool-aid drinker. :) Well it's not good enough for me. More people need to question authority and the decisions others make. If you don't, you aren't a patriot or anything similar, you are a fool. Patriots question authority.

-Chris.

Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di for Pentax

01/26/2006 02:01:44 AM · #34

Patriots question everything, including pleas for support.

Message edited by author 2006-01-26 02:02:32.

Artyste

Sony Ericsson W810i

01/26/2006 02:03:35 AM · #35

Originally posted by ChrisW123:

Originally posted by Artyste:
I would personally rather assume the SC has done their homework and have a very valid reason for not only a) locking the thread, but b) keeping it from the rest of DPC. Personally, I don't care to know the sordid details, it's enough to know that my interests are being protected. Something red-lighted that post and it seems like an investigation was given and something warranted it being shut down.

Good enough for me.

Hahahaha, spoken like a good kool-aid drinker. :) Well it's not good enough for me. More people need to question authority and the decisions others make. If you don't, you aren't a patriot or anything similar, you are a fool. Patriots question authority.

-Chris.

When warranted. Nothing in this case leads me to believe it's warranted, but you go right ahead, nobody is trying to stop you.

As for fools:
Only fools rush in
Fool me once, shame on you...
and, The best way to convince a fool that he is wrong is to let him have his own way.

Message edited by author 2006-01-26 02:04:13.

Canon EOS-20D

Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di for Canon

01/26/2006 02:04:30 AM · #36

Originally posted by ChrisW123:

If you actually want answers, perhaps you should learn to phrase your questions differently. If not, then by all means, rant away.

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

01/26/2006 02:05:30 AM · #37

Originally posted by Mousie:

Patriots question everything, including pleas for support.

Absolutely. Give me the details if you have them. :) Any way I gotta log now... :( Have fun fellow DPC'rs.

notonline

Canon EOS-350D Rebel XT

01/26/2006 02:08:29 AM · #38

Originally posted by roadrunner:

i have NEVER been so disgusted in my whole life....
if this is true or not, where do some of you people get off carrying on like this..
i think this thread may have just done it for me with dpc... i don't think im as perfect as the majority here, so i obviously don't belong...

sorry to hear this brookelyns bridge...

note to self, NEVER tell dpc anything, they already know everything....!!! and if not, they'll make it their business....

some of you really need to venture outside and get involved in your own live's

Roadrunner, I'd personally hate to see someone go because of some stupid sh!t. Your here for photography and NOT to make friends. If you understand them and be friendly but not befriend then you will be better off here. You can also take that advice into your everyday life. Your friends are your friends and they are true to you but be leary of people on the net. On the "net" they can be anything and anyone.

Canon 12x IS USM (S3 IS built-in Lens) -- 36-432mm (35mm EQ)

01/26/2006 02:08:43 AM · #39

Originally posted by mk:

Originally posted by ChrisW123:

Hahahaha, spoken like a good kool-aid drinker. :) Well it's not good enough for me. More people need to question authority and the decisions others make. If you don't, you aren't a patriot or anything similar, you are a fool. Patriots question authority.

-Chris.

If you actually want answers, perhaps you should learn to phrase your questions differently. If not, then by all means, rant away.

MK, how is this ranting?

GeneralE

Canon PowerShot S3 IS

01/26/2006 02:09:58 AM · #40

Originally posted by ChrisW123:

Patriots question authority.

-Chris.

: )

See my sig ...

01/26/2006 02:10:56 AM · #41

Originally posted by ChrisW123:

Originally posted by Mousie:
Patriots question everything, including pleas for support.

Absolutely. Give me the details if you have them. :) Any way I gotta log now... :( Have fun fellow DPC'rs.

What, so you can be lazy? I was able to collect enough info to satisfy my own (immediate!) suspicions without even leaving the DPC forums. See, you just click on her profile... then see where she's posted... then read it... then maybe Google for a minute or two for more points on the graph... simple really. Where's your patriotic can-do attitude?

01/26/2006 02:11:20 AM · #42

Originally posted by GeneralE:

Originally posted by ChrisW123:
Patriots question authority.

-Chris.

: )

See my sig ...

I know General, I knew you'd love this. :) hehehe.

01/26/2006 02:16:04 AM · #43

Originally posted by Mousie:

OK Mouseie... "without leaving the DPC forums" and then "Maybe Google for a minute" are a little bit contradictory don't you think? The information I'm presented with are here, on two threads I have read. If you have more, give it to me, or shut up. :)

Message edited by frisca - removed personal attack.

Pentax SMC P-DA 12-24mm F4.0 ED/AL (IF)

01/26/2006 02:35:31 AM · #44

Just because I went the extra distance to validate the impression I got from reading these forums does not make my statement contradictory at all. If anything, it demonstrates my openmindedness, in that I felt it was important to use more than one source before coming to a final conclusion.

Frankly, I'm bemused why you think my assertion that other people may have done some investigation and come up with the same conclusion that I have is such a problem and requires me to prove anything to you. All I've pointed out is that one person, me, did so, and that it's quite likely that others have as well. Oh, and I made a tasteless joke about a car accident.

My parents always made me look stuff up myself when I was a kid, and now that I'm older I think it's an excellent practice, as much as I may have found it unpleasant at the time. So no, to either of your requests.

Message edited by author 2006-01-26 02:36:46.

Pano

Pentax K10D

01/26/2006 03:00:29 AM · #45

I would like to know why the SC is not speaking up on this one?
If the reasons she was called a lier are 'secret' Ok , but at least they could provide an explanation why they can not speak about..

Why the mistery?
Why this 'dogmatic' attitude?

Art Roflmao

Canon EOS-6D Mark II