| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/24/2006 11:06:54 AM · #26 |
Mr ed, two expensive dates or one REALLY expensive date. ;)
I also find the one in pink cuter, but they aren't my type either. Too much hair. Nice cheekbones. |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 11:07:34 AM · #27 |
| Is the photo work safe??? I don't want to wait till I get home to look at it....LOL |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 11:11:04 AM · #28 |
Originally posted by lonewolf:
Is the photo work safe??? I don't want to wait till I get home to look at it....LOL |
It's fully clothed... just two chicks standing together.
|
|
|
|
01/24/2006 11:19:23 AM · #29 |
Well, if I weren't married it wouldn't matter to me anyway. If I tried to speak to either of them at a function they'd just slap me for daring to think I was in their league.
:-P
|
|
|
|
01/24/2006 11:34:25 AM · #30 |
bah.. they could both use a good meal.
then again, so could I.
|
|
|
|
01/24/2006 12:04:05 PM · #31 |
| Being that I have been single for a while now (help me!!!!) I would not kick either one of them out of bed. I do think the one on the left is prettier but the one on the right is very good looking as well. I do agree that they could use some more meat on their bones, I'm not into stick chicks BUT like I said I would not kick either one of them out of bed, they are both hot. |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 12:11:16 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by BobsterLobster:
What's to get? The girl on the right is gorgeous... |
no what was hot was your old profile pic-whut happened? |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 12:54:54 PM · #33 |
Haha, that's very kind of you! It freaked out my male friends though so I got rid of it...
|
|
|
|
01/24/2006 02:24:53 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip:
Well, if I weren't married it wouldn't matter to me anyway. If I tried to speak to either of them at a function they'd just slap me for daring to think I was in their league.
:-P |
Considering they are both 8's you'd have to be a 16 just to walk up to them. lol |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 02:28:54 PM · #35 |
| I could walk up to them but I wouldn't exist to them....lol |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 02:31:59 PM · #36 |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 02:45:33 PM · #37 |
Originally posted by Canadian_eh:
lmao, would any of us? |
walking up to them is easy.
it's the speaking part that is tough.
|
|
|
|
01/24/2006 02:47:02 PM · #38 |
Originally posted by Canadian_eh:
lmao, would any of us? |
I'd bet money on it if we were out somewhere that I could get one of their numbers.
|
|
|
|
01/24/2006 02:48:26 PM · #39 |
Originally posted by dpaull:
I'd bet money on it if we were out somewhere that I could get one of their numbers. |
Good luck getting the other six. ;-) |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 02:49:09 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by dpaull:
I'd bet money on it if we were out somewhere that I could get one of their numbers. |
Good luck getting the other six. ;-) |
ahaha
ahahahahahah
that was great
|
|
|
|
01/24/2006 02:51:25 PM · #41 |
You guys laugh...I've been known to bet dinners on stuff like this, and then win...then I order the lobster and expensive drinks...if we're ever in person, we'll bet.
Heck, I won this one once, and no one believed that I got ALL FOUR girls numbers...they said they must be fake...so they called their cell phones one at a time from three tables away...of course I didn't want to date any of them, I had a girlfriend, I just wanted free food.
|
|
|
|
01/24/2006 03:07:08 PM · #42 |
Originally posted by dpaull:
...I've been known to bet dinners on stuff like this, and then win |
Hehe... I have no reason to doubt you. I thought it was funny the way you worded it and couldn't resist.
Cute models, but a photo only says so much. I've already found my ribbon-winner. ;-) |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 03:11:19 PM · #43 |
Heck, I'd ask for their numbers. Bet that if I had my camera around my neck, they'd talk to me, too! I heard somewhere that chicks dig photographers.
Although if that's true, why am I still single?
|
|
|
|
01/24/2006 03:12:00 PM · #44 |
| I need to hang out with you Dave, you can get numbers for me....LOL |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 03:13:33 PM · #45 |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 03:15:41 PM · #46 |
Originally posted by larryslights:
DNMC |
Does Not Meet Chicks?
Do Not Merit Consideration?
Dpaull Never Made Conversation?
Drives Nerdy Men Crazy?
Drool, No Mention of Cerebral?
Those darn acronyms always confuse me!
Message edited by author 2006-01-24 15:34:55. |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 03:27:51 PM · #47 |
| I know you'll get angry at me for this..but as a woman on this site I am finding this thread a little offensive....Had to say it. |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 03:30:46 PM · #48 |
|
|
|
01/24/2006 03:33:50 PM · #49 |
Originally posted by Rae-Ann:
I know you'll get angry at me for this..but as a woman on this site I am finding this thread a little offensive....Had to say it. |
BANANA HAMOCK WARNING:
//www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00006X4BL/zx81kit-20/102-1910646-2715348
Message edited by author 2006-01-24 15:36:11.
|
|
|
|
01/24/2006 03:35:45 PM · #50 |
That needs a "Banana Hammock Warning" label
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/19/2025 11:39:27 PM EDT.
