Author | Thread |
|
01/17/2006 04:10:32 PM · #1 |
After visiting a Denny's restaurant I decided to vote on the Recipe (foods) II challenge.
Given that Denny's is a large restaurant chain with thousands of stores and their menu has some of the best food pictures I've seen and also given that they likely paid huge sums of money to get those pictures I made this voting decision...
Voting criteria:
If an entry is as good as the average Denny's menu image then it can't be voted less than an 8!
Though before my Denny's visit I would have not thought this, my discovery is that by that standard about 40 percent of the images should(and did) get 8 or 8+ scores.
This just supports a growing feeling that, on average, DPCers tend to be low scoring voters.
And I bet it does not take long for one of those low scoring DPCers to suggest that the pictures on the Denny's menu suck. :)
|
|
|
01/17/2006 04:17:03 PM · #2 |
Originally posted by stdavidson: And I bet it does not take long for one of those low scoring DPCers to suggest that the pictures on the Denny's menu suck. :) |
I just wish they more accurately reflected what actually arrives on the plate ...
Note that their high-gloss lamination and relatively bright and unbalanced room lighting make it pretty hard to really see and evaluate the photos for anything other than composition.
Message edited by author 2006-01-17 16:18:46. |
|
|
01/17/2006 04:18:13 PM · #3 |
Denny's food photography sucks :-) BUT, it works for them... It's clientele-based; anything less obvious and substantial gets negative reactions. One of my assistants went into business for himself and landed the Denny's account back in the 80's. It was a constant source of frustration for him.
R. |
|
|
01/17/2006 04:23:01 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by GeneralE: Originally posted by stdavidson: And I bet it does not take long for one of those low scoring DPCers to suggest that the pictures on the Denny's menu suck. :) |
I just wish they more accurately reflected what actually arrives on the plate ...
|
They do--just not everywhere. Have you ever been to a Japanese Denny's? |
|
|
01/17/2006 04:24:14 PM · #5 |
Denny's food photography is really not very good. But it's a lot better than the food, which is a lot better than the service. (At least at my local Denny's) Of course, after a few visits and getting really, exceptionally poor service, I have stopped going there or to any other Denny's.
|
|
|
01/17/2006 04:29:01 PM · #6 |
Haven't been to a Dennys since I left California what, 6 years ago? We have "Friendly's" here, but that's just an occasional road-breakfast stop for me. My Dennys days were when the kids were young, and I suffered through them...
R. |
|
|
01/17/2006 04:30:10 PM · #7 |
We have Mac and KFC over here... never heard of Dennys, but that seems to be ok :P |
|
|
01/17/2006 04:31:31 PM · #8 |
Keep in mind Denny's (Red Lobster, Beefsteak Charlies etc.)use a wide dof to insure that people know exactly what they are getting. Where magazine make things looks more dreamy and occasionally use Very shallow, sometimes odd, dof's to be more artsy (I guess?). Cookbooks? ...somewhere in the middle.
Message edited by author 2006-01-17 17:12:05. |
|
|
01/17/2006 04:41:07 PM · #9 |
Those of you bitchin about your Denny's please feel free to box it up and ship it up here, there is NO 24hr restraunt within 75 miles of here, we'd gladly take it! Sucks when your late night dining choices are limited to stale convenience store coffee, 7-11's "gourmet" nachos, or dunkin donuts day old donuts!
Message edited by author 2006-01-17 16:46:01. |
|
|
01/17/2006 05:20:24 PM · #10 |
I saw this cover yesterday on Gourmet Magazine. Look at how the entire right side of the cheesecake is blurred and the back is also out of focus, as well. In fact, it looks like the nuts on top and a bit of the cake botton left are the only things in focus.
Strange looking photography but totaly en vogue.
Message edited by author 2006-01-17 17:22:15. |
|
|
01/17/2006 05:28:35 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by mfairbanks: Those of you bitchin about your Denny's please feel free to box it up and ship it up here, there is NO 24hr restraunt within 75 miles of here, we'd gladly take it! Sucks when your late night dining choices are limited to stale convenience store coffee, 7-11's "gourmet" nachos, or dunkin donuts day old donuts! |
No late night food?!?!? How do you heathens survive?
I grew up in Indianapolis and after highschool work for a fastfood place that was open 24/7 and occasionally would work some 11-7's. The best part was the drunks pulling into the drive through at 4 AM when all the bars closed. Shear entertainment! |
|
|
01/17/2006 05:35:35 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by biteme: We have Mac and KFC over here... never heard of Dennys, but that seems to be ok :P |
Dennys is a national chain of Coffee Shops, open 24 hours (usually). They serve everything from standard breakfasts to dinner combos like chicken-fired steak meals, roast beef, whatever. The quality is low (from a foodie's perspective) but consistent. Seating is in booths and at tables, there is waitress service, theyhave counter service also, you get the picture.
They bridge the gap between fast food like Mickey D and KFC and "real" restaurants like Red Lobster (to name a national chain of "real" restaurant, not to say red Lobster is especially good).
R. |
|
|
01/17/2006 05:42:40 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by pawdrix: I saw this cover yesterday on Gourmet Magazine. Look at how the entire right side of the cheesecake is blurred and the back is also out of focus, as well. In fact, it looks like the nuts on top and a bit of the cake botton left are the only things in focus.
Strange looking photography but totaly en vogue. |
Typically I'd sparingly make use of foreground soft focused DOF with an image but here it is right on the front cover of a big time magazine. If this is an example of good food photography then it speaks highly of the quality of the DPC entries. Plenty DPC entries are as good or better than their cover.
|
|
|
01/17/2006 05:45:21 PM · #14 |
We actually have Dennys here in New Zealand, and their actual food doesn't look as good as the pictures ... but it is close ... we were however very with the good photography there... so if you score me an eight I will be more impressed.
Kari |
|
|
01/17/2006 05:51:25 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by kari1: We actually have Dennys here in New Zealand, and their actual food doesn't look as good as the pictures ... but it is close ... we were however very with the good photography there... so if you score me an eight I will be more impressed. |
If you entered the foods challenge then I scored you and left a comment as well.
|
|
|
01/17/2006 06:42:45 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by stdavidson: Originally posted by pawdrix: I saw this cover yesterday on Gourmet Magazine. Look at how the entire right side of the cheesecake is blurred and the back is also out of focus, as well. In fact, it looks like the nuts on top and a bit of the cake botton left are the only things in focus.
Strange looking photography but totaly en vogue. |
Typically I'd sparingly make use of foreground soft focused DOF with an image but here it is right on the front cover of a big time magazine. If this is an example of good food photography then it speaks highly of the quality of the DPC entries. Plenty DPC entries are as good or better than their cover. |
They use incredibly soft focus all over the place...usually starting, sharp, up front and immediately fading back. Not a new trend but it's getting crazy...I like it in a way but I know that it would drive DPCers absolutely insane.
In that particular image they added additional blurring on the sides, the back...all over.
Message edited by author 2006-01-17 20:12:00. |
|
|
01/18/2006 12:57:37 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by GeneralE: Originally posted by stdavidson: And I bet it does not take long for one of those low scoring DPCers to suggest that the pictures on the Denny's menu suck. :) |
I just wish they more accurately reflected what actually arrives on the plate ... |
Heck, if they did that nobody would order anything. :) The photographers did their job right.
All protestation to the contrary, photographers rarely present an accurate view of their subject. Doing so would be dull and boring. They apply DOF, color manipulation, perspective angles, lighting or any amount of photographic trickery to make their subjects look more appealing or convey an emotion or make a political/philosophical statement. More often than not absolute accuracy plays a secondary role.
|
|
|
01/18/2006 02:19:29 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by stdavidson: More often than not absolute accuracy plays a secondary role. |
Thank God!!!
I have my eyes (knock on wood) for absolute accuracy. When I look at a photo, I want vision I can't get with my eyes. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/17/2025 05:32:34 PM EDT.