| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/28/2005 12:22:53 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by neenee1999:
Not so good, was hoping for better, oh well maybe next time :0
Votes: 57
Views: 87
Avg Vote: 5.6491
Comments: 2
Favorites: 1
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 12/28/05 12:10 pm |
You got a fav already!
|
|
|
|
12/28/2005 01:43:50 PM · #27 |
Votes: 70
Views: 107
Avg Vote: 5.5000
Comments: 2
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 12/28/05 01:10 pm
Quite ok i guess :), up till now better then my previous challenges. (3 so far)
Don't have my hopes up so high.
|
|
|
|
12/28/2005 10:36:14 PM · #28 |
Votes: 115
Views: 174
Avg Vote: 5.6783
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Not too bad, I suppose |
|
|
|
12/29/2005 04:58:12 AM · #29 |
I am quite happy!
Votes: 144
Views: 182
Avg Vote: 5.5208
Comments: 3
And all the comments are good. This is my third challenge and it seems I am gaining 0.7 every time. Hope it will hold!
|
|
|
|
12/29/2005 06:17:59 AM · #30 |
With this very first challenge submission I'm getting closer and closer to my aim and I'm happy with that. The shot has 0 favs and is on 0 wishlists but it's just fine. Have 134 votes and I like it, thank you all who voted!
(No, I won't post my score here.) |
|
|
|
12/29/2005 08:45:35 AM · #31 |
Votes: 144
Views: 183
Avg Vote: 5.1806
Comments: 2
oh well, I'm fine with this. wasn't the best shot since a while, maybe that explains it ;) |
|
|
|
12/29/2005 09:45:33 AM · #32 |
| I just finished voting on this challenge (did not enter) and I cannot believe the HIGH percentage of shots that have absolutely NOTHING to do with the challenge except that the word OOPS appears in the title. Very disappointing for a challenge that had so many possibilities and opportunities to be creative. |
|
|
|
12/29/2005 01:59:57 PM · #33 |
Votes: 167
Views: 213
Avg Vote: 6.0479
Comments: 5
Updated: 12/29/05 01:53 pm
It feels good to be above 6 again (even if it's barely above.) I was pleased with one aspect of the shot, but not the other. I spent much of the week trying to decide if I'd pull it, then the server went down and the decision was made. Thank you, server.
Thanks so far, and keep voting high. (BTW, I predicted either a 4.75 or a 5.9, depending on which aspect the voters found dominant.) |
|
|
|
12/29/2005 04:24:29 PM · #34 |
Votes: 180
Views: 272
Avg Vote: 5.7500
Comments: 9
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Wahoo! Highest scoring picture for me yet :-) |
|
|
|
12/30/2005 02:57:45 AM · #35 |
| Received the 200th vote and since the 150th or so I'm getting further and further from my aim. :( |
|
|
|
12/30/2005 03:10:34 AM · #36 |
Votes: 218
Views: 337
Avg Vote: 5.8165
Comments: 10
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Yay!! |
|
|
|
12/30/2005 05:32:31 AM · #37 |
Votes: 217
Views: 328
Avg Vote: 5.4562
Comments: 7
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Ok with that :) |
|
|
|
12/30/2005 02:09:28 PM · #38 |
Votes: 228
Views: 402
Avg Vote: 5.5000
Comments: 10
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 12/30/05 01:52 pm
What a crappy score for a perfectly composed picture. Perhaps I titled it wrong.
|
|
|
|
12/30/2005 05:13:49 PM · #39 |
Votes: 247
Views: 378
Avg Vote: 5.8745
Comments: 13
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0 |
|
|
|
12/31/2005 07:38:41 PM · #40 |
Hope I get your crappy vote ;-)
I have notised that between 8 and 10 GMT I get much higher votes! Anybody thought of that?
Originally posted by nsbca7:
Votes: 228
Views: 402
Avg Vote: 5.5000
Comments: 10
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 12/30/05 01:52 pm
What a crappy score for a perfectly composed picture. Perhaps I titled it wrong. |
|
|
|
|
12/31/2005 07:43:50 PM · #41 |
I also noticed that you get much fewer votes but more Views!?
Wondee why?
(and sorry I ment I hope that I will get your crappy score)
Votes:
283
Views:
370
Avg Vote:
5.4770
Comments:
5
Originally posted by nsbca7:
Votes: 228
Views: 402
Avg Vote: 5.5000
Comments: 10
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 12/30/05 01:52 pm
What a crappy score for a perfectly composed picture. Perhaps I titled it wrong. |
|
|
|
|
01/01/2006 07:26:19 AM · #42 |
Thought this means a lot:
Votes: 281
Views: 390
[edit: my current results]
But reading through scores (for the first time, to be frank) I found that it's usual. Why doesn't people vote, is it a trouble to click the number instead of "Back"? For the lower quality pictures it's more reasonable but above 5.5?! Even if they click based only on the infamous "immediate wow factor", isn't it nicer to tell how you feel about the shot? I'm not talking about commenting what takes time, I'm just talking about positioning the cursor before the goodbye-click.
Message edited by author 2006-01-01 07:27:13. |
|
|
|
01/02/2006 05:08:11 PM · #43 |
Votes: 359
Views: 551
Avg Vote: 5.7604
Comments: 17
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
It's going down slowly and painfully |
|
|
|
01/03/2006 12:24:36 AM · #44 |
Hmmm...this challenge has been pretty quiet. What's up with that? :P
|
|
|
|
01/03/2006 03:32:39 AM · #45 |
Votes: 389
Views: 511
Avg Vote: 5.1003
Comments: 4
no surprises :) |
|
|
|
01/03/2006 08:13:31 AM · #46 |
I quite enjoyed voting on this challenge. But then I am not one of the DNMTC crowd ;)
Only two 3s and two 4s, loads of 7s. I didn't read many of the titles which probably explains a lot.
Roger |
|
|
|
01/03/2006 05:41:49 PM · #47 |
nice to see my score is hovering where i kinda wanted it to be ;)
Votes: 446
Views: 669
Avg Vote: 6.2924
Comments: 32
Favorites: 1
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 01/03/06 05:39 pm
|
|
|
|
01/04/2006 03:50:23 AM · #48 |
Has anyone else noticed when reviewing the Ooops final results how incredibly low the scoring was?
The winning image barely made 7 at 7.035, the red ribbon 6.786 and by the time you get to 5th and an honourable mention we're at 6.3.
Has there been a lower-scoring challenge? What is the reason?
Brett |
|
|
|
01/04/2006 10:16:18 AM · #49 |
Originally posted by KiwiPix:
Has anyone else noticed when reviewing the Ooops final results how incredibly low the scoring was? |
It wasn't low enough for me. I missed my aim by 0.215 (up, this should by emphasized), and I don't understand why. Maybe because of those who vote sighing "I'll give him a mediocre score because I don't want to comment my 1-2-3". I received 63 5's and even 11 6's for a shot I wanted to PP to crap! (Plus 2-3 7's, 8's and 10's but I don't argue about it because I know there are visitors in every challenge coming only to ruin voting.)
About the average: many photos in this run have nothing to do with Oops, this has been discussed. This gives a bad feeling to a voter (like me, at least) and she/he can get rid of this feeling even when sees a fitting image after 10s of unfitting. So even the good shot gets lower score.
All above "IMO", of course. |
|
|
|
01/04/2006 10:31:58 AM · #50 |
Originally posted by KiwiPix:
Has anyone else noticed when reviewing the Ooops final results how incredibly low the scoring was?
The winning image barely made 7 at 7.035, the red ribbon 6.786 and by the time you get to 5th and an honourable mention we're at 6.3.
Has there been a lower-scoring challenge? What is the reason?
Brett |
yeah it was a very poor challenge in my opinion. oops1 was better. Oh and if someone gets a honorable mention, whatever the score is it is an honorable mention.
Message edited by author 2006-01-04 10:33:30. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/13/2025 06:02:55 PM EST.
