| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/15/2005 11:52:39 AM · #1 |
I'll bet most of you can find a curious one out there!
|
|
|
|
12/15/2005 12:07:17 PM · #2 |
Much hard in the northeast.....
How about "Tile & Slate Roofs"
This should cover much of the southern and west (tile) and northeast/midwest (slate). |
|
|
|
12/15/2005 12:14:42 PM · #3 |
Sure, it could be extended to all types of roofs, but I'd keep tall buildings out of it unless they had a "special" roof, I mean not the usual flat "pool-type" roof
|
|
|
|
12/15/2005 12:22:53 PM · #4 |
easy for the people in spain but not the people where its snowing.
You also might want to include a description. |
|
|
|
12/15/2005 12:41:32 PM · #5 |
| How about just rooftops. Most roofs here are just ashphalt. Very rare to find anything else. |
|
|
|
12/15/2005 12:51:03 PM · #6 |
| I've only ever seen one tiled roof in the city. Not very common in Newfoundland. |
|
|
|
12/15/2005 01:31:27 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by cpanaioti:
How about just rooftops. Most roofs here are just ashphalt. Very rare to find anything else. |
'Rooftop' would be more accessable to everyone -- but, challenge discription not withstanding, it changes the meaning from pictures of rooftops to pictures taken from rooftops. Both would be good challenges, but are apples and oranges in the same one.
David
|
|
|
|
12/15/2005 01:33:52 PM · #8 |
| Why would rooftops imply taking a picture from there rather than of one (or several)? |
|
|
|
12/15/2005 01:40:56 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by cpanaioti:
Why would rooftops imply taking a picture from there rather than of one (or several)? |
Just the way I'm use to hearing the words used, I suppose.
Roofs would be shots of roofs, but rooftop is also a specific kind of shot. It's not alone, a 'table' shot would imply a shot with the camera sitting on the table rather than a shot of a table -- and 'hand-held' a shot without extra camera support as opposed to one of hands holding something.
David
|
|
|
|
12/15/2005 02:26:10 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Britannica:
Originally posted by cpanaioti:
Why would rooftops imply taking a picture from there rather than of one (or several)? |
Just the way I'm use to hearing the words used, I suppose.
Roofs would be shots of roofs, but rooftop is also a specific kind of shot. It's not alone, a 'table' shot would imply a shot with the camera sitting on the table rather than a shot of a table -- and 'hand-held' a shot without extra camera support as opposed to one of hands holding something.
David |
I don't get your logic. I can see it either way.
Message edited by author 2005-12-15 14:26:54. |
|
|
|
12/15/2005 02:37:40 PM · #11 |
Ok, the original thought was to take shots of rooftops. And if at the beggining I thought that city rooftops woulden't be attractive (photolikewise), now I think they can make just as good shots as any other kind of roof.
I think it would make a good challange.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/16/2025 07:13:21 AM EDT.
