| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/29/2005 07:32:42 AM · #1 |
Sometime it̢۪s coming into my mind that which camera model and the lens are the costliest of the word?
Friend do you have any idea about these? ;o)
Rudra |
|
|
|
11/29/2005 07:53:06 AM · #2 |
Originally posted by PERCOM:
Sometime it̢۪s coming into my mind that which camera model and the lens are the costliest of the word?
Friend do you have any idea about these? ;o)
Rudra |
coolest of this world??? I'd suggest the hubble telescope. :D
|
|
|
|
11/29/2005 09:02:00 AM · #3 |
|
|
|
11/29/2005 09:17:44 AM · #4 |
Not my eyes, I wish I was seeing a bit better :)
I go with the Hubble aswell :D |
|
|
|
11/29/2005 10:07:12 AM · #5 |
Read this :
Christie's set a new world record price for a camera in their January 2001 sale when a prototype Phantom photographic outfit sold for £146,750 with commission, breaking the previous record, also held by Christie's at £55,750 set in 1995.
Click Here |
|
|
|
11/29/2005 10:13:13 AM · #6 |
how many megapixels is it :p
that's a huge & expensive camera.. :-| |
|
|
|
11/29/2005 12:38:26 PM · #7 |
Speaking real-world cameras, try the Cambo Wide DS digital cam for $35,000?
Cambo Wide DS
Robt. |
|
|
|
11/29/2005 12:53:55 PM · #8 |
My brother takes pictures using the camera on one of these--does that count? ;-) Not sure how much they cost.
(Some pictures he took using a different camera).
Nordlys
Message edited by author 2005-11-29 12:54:15. |
|
|
|
11/29/2005 12:56:58 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Nordlys:
My brother takes pictures using the camera on one of these--does that count? ;-) Not sure how much they cost.
(Some pictures he took using a different camera).
Nordlys |
Nah; the plane qualifies as a TRIPOD, an "accessory". Nice try! jejejeâ„¢
R. |
|
|
|
11/29/2005 01:05:17 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
Nah; the plane qualifies as a TRIPOD, an "accessory". Nice try! jejejeâ„¢
R. |
:) Yes, that is a nice tripod! Still, the camera holds it's own I think. ;-) ("The U-2 B camera has a 36-inch focal length and can resolve features as small as .75 meters (2.5 feet) from an altitude of 19.5 kilometers (65,000 feet).") |
|
|
|
11/29/2005 03:02:33 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by Nordlys:
Originally posted by bear_music:
Nah; the plane qualifies as a TRIPOD, an "accessory". Nice try! jejejeâ„¢
R. |
:) Yes, that is a nice tripod! Still, the camera holds it's own I think. ;-) ("The U-2 B camera has a 36-inch focal length and can resolve features as small as .75 meters (2.5 feet) from an altitude of 19.5 kilometers (65,000 feet).") |
The cameras used in the SR-71 Blackbird were a significant step forward from what was used in the U-2. Since the U-2's are still flying and the SR-71's are not, maybe the cameras in the U-2's are ahead now.
|
|
|
|
11/29/2005 03:16:07 PM · #12 |
| The Hasselblad H2D is not the most expensive but at $27000 you would want it to be good |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/27/2025 10:42:39 AM EDT.
