| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/23/2005 12:57:45 AM · #151 |
Originally posted by justin_hewlett:
Right, but I wasn't the "killer." |
You still aren't so...
|
|
|
|
11/23/2005 12:58:21 AM · #152 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
Originally posted by mavrik:
kirbic killed 606. |
SC has unfair advamntage, they can lock threads after commenting on them :-) And DO...
R. |
If people didn't fight and learned to use the search (and/or their eyes), we wouldn't have to lock as many and it would be win/win for all! I doubt any of the SC would be sad to give up their "advantage." |
|
|
|
11/23/2005 02:46:08 AM · #153 |
Originally posted by mk:
Originally posted by bear_music:
Originally posted by mavrik:
kirbic killed 606. |
SC has unfair advamntage, they can lock threads after commenting on them :-) And DO...
R. |
If people didn't fight and learned to use the search (and/or their eyes), we wouldn't have to lock as many and it would be win/win for all! I doubt any of the SC would be sad to give up their "advantage." |
Just so we're clear on it, that was a joke... jejeje�
R. |
|
|
|
11/23/2005 03:06:19 AM · #154 |
Always with the last word, huh bear? :P
ps: "advantage has no "m" in it.
Originally posted by bear_music:
SC has unfair advamntage... |
:P :P :P |
|
|
|
11/23/2005 03:17:38 AM · #155 |
Good night my precious thread... sleep well.... he he he
|
|
|
|
11/23/2005 06:42:55 AM · #156 |
|
|
|
11/23/2005 07:01:53 AM · #157 |
|
|
|
11/23/2005 07:54:06 AM · #158 |
Originally posted by queanbeez:
mines still not working? |
Mine either. I think it is still calculating my threads killed total. =)
|
|
|
|
11/23/2005 09:52:19 AM · #159 |
Looks like they're doing a few at a time...
Threads Created: 86
Threads Killed: 329
|
|
|
|
11/23/2005 09:55:56 AM · #160 |
Hehehehehe.... looks like I just butt in on other people's conversations!!
Posts: 796
Threads Created: 44
Threads Killed: 34
|
|
|
|
11/23/2005 02:44:28 PM · #161 |
# Threads Created: 41
# Threads Killed: 78
now let's see if I kill this one |
|
|
|
11/23/2005 02:51:57 PM · #162 |
Threads Created: 9
Threads Killed: 59
I thought I'd killed more, now I don't feel so bad. |
|
|
|
11/23/2005 07:07:53 PM · #163 |
I'm not sure I believe these numbers at all.
Adding up all the numbers of supposedly killed threads that are posted in this thread alone, seem to be more than the total number of threads ever posted, and this isn't even the tip of the tip of the tip of the iceberg!
Where are our maths gurus? Scott, we need you!
Can those numbers be right?
|
|
|
|
11/24/2005 08:23:28 AM · #164 |
I don't understand the purpose. It's probably somewhere on page 3 of this thread but I'm lazy.
|
|
|
|
11/24/2005 08:46:12 AM · #165 |
Originally posted by mk:
If people didn't fight and learned to use the search (and/or their eyes), we wouldn't have to lock as many and it would be win/win for all! I doubt any of the SC would be sad to give up their "advantage." |
If the search didn't turn up 500+ thread results for a word, most of which do not even contain the word in question, they wouldn't need to start so many. =)
Originally posted by Beetle:
I'm not sure I believe these numbers at all.
...
Can those numbers be right? |
Are you kidding me? I don't think you realize the sheer number of threads that go through here. I'm pretty sure they are accurate. |
|
|
|
11/24/2005 09:10:53 AM · #166 |
Originally posted by jadin:
[quote=mk]If people didn't fight and learned to use the search (and/or their eyes), we wouldn't have to lock as many and it would be win/win for all! I doubt any of the SC would be sad to give up their "advantage." |
If the search didn't turn up 500+ thread results for a word, most of which do not even contain the word in question, they wouldn't need to start so many. =)
That's strange. I's say over 95% of the time I search for a thread, I find the one I'm looking for. Sometimes I need to search for a couple words, but I'll find it.
Can you give me an example?
~Terry
|
|
|
|
11/24/2005 09:20:08 AM · #167 |
Originally posted by Beetle:
I'm not sure I believe these numbers at all.
Adding up all the numbers of supposedly killed threads that are posted in this thread alone, seem to be more than the total number of threads ever posted, and this isn't even the tip of the tip of the tip of the iceberg!
Where are our maths gurus? Scott, we need you!
Can those numbers be right? |
As of right now, total threads listed in all forums combined is 684,613...
Robt. |
|
|
|
11/24/2005 09:38:50 AM · #168 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
As of right now, total threads listed in all forums combined is 684,613...
Robt. |
That sounds high to me. This is FORUM_THREAD_ID=307440, and even that number will be high since each photo's comment area has a FORUM_THREAD_ID.
~Terry
|
|
|
|
11/24/2005 09:49:38 AM · #169 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle:
Can you give me an example?
~Terry |
In testing I think I figured it out...
I searched for "referral" and found 998 threads.
It's searching the actual html of each page. The result is any word in a link is found as well. Which includes links in people's signatures.
So if I put a link to "porniswrong.com" (after i post this i'm going to have to see if that's an actual website ;)) in my signature, everytime someone searches for "porn" every single one of my posts will show up in the result.
Correct me if I'm assuming incorrectly.
Edit : it is not a website =)
Message edited by author 2005-11-24 09:50:06. |
|
|
|
11/24/2005 09:58:31 AM · #170 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle:
Originally posted by bear_music:
As of right now, total threads listed in all forums combined is 684,613...
Robt. |
That sounds high to me. This is FORUM_THREAD_ID=307440, and even that number will be high since each photo's comment area has a FORUM_THREAD_ID.
~Terry |
Sorry. Should have said "Total POSTS in all forums".
Robt. |
|
|
|
11/24/2005 10:12:49 AM · #171 |
It appears you're correct.
I agree that including signatures in search is a bit counterintuitive.
I'm not sure how easy this is to change. I'll post the issue for Drew and Langdon to take a look at.
Thanks,
~Terry
|
|
|
|
11/24/2005 10:26:41 AM · #172 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle:
It appears you're correct.
I agree that including signatures in search is a bit counterintuitive.
I'm not sure how easy this is to change. I'll post the issue for Drew and Langdon to take a look at.
Thanks,
~Terry |
Easy way to fix it is to turn off signatures. Permanently :-)
R. |
|
|
|
11/24/2005 12:16:44 PM · #173 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
Easy way to fix it is to turn off signatures. Permanently :-) |
Works for me. |
|
|
|
11/24/2005 02:46:41 PM · #174 |
| I am the queen of thread killers. End of! |
|
|
|
11/24/2005 03:06:31 PM · #175 |
This thread lives all the lust to see it die. :-)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/10/2025 06:44:46 PM EDT.
