Author | Thread |
|
11/05/2005 08:13:15 AM · #1 |
just got the ST-E2 wireless flash transmittor - ran a couple test shots with it, one 550ex flash, and the 50mm f:1.8. i have yet to get a second one.
seems like it will be a usefull tool for a small studio. i don't have a lot of open space at our house at the moment.
flash power was set at -1.3 stops. minimal edits - black and white points set, and slightly cropped.
also helps to have a good model ;}
|
|
|
11/05/2005 08:19:26 AM · #2 |
Wow that is good. I really like the one with the rim lighting. Exactly where did you place the flash. I wouldn't mind trying that myself. Thanks. |
|
|
11/05/2005 10:03:21 AM · #3 |
I have the STE2 and a 550EX, I also picked up a broken 420EX which has a problem following the lens zoom, but hey as an extra fill in light who cares ;-)
I would look around on eBay for a 420 as your 2nd flash, you may pick up a real bargain like mine.
|
|
|
11/05/2005 12:40:21 PM · #4 |
the flash was on the kitchen counter - aimed down - and powered down to -1.3 stops i think - about 4-5 feet away. i shut off all the other lights for a quick second while i snapped the shot. i set the black point after as the exposure was still a bit bright - i noticed on this computer some banding - and i dunno what that is from - there really isn't any editing done besides the black point adjustment. i'll try rediting it later - as this was done at 7am today in about 20 seconds ;}
thanks !
Originally posted by JulieG: Wow that is good. I really like the one with the rim lighting. Exactly where did you place the flash. I wouldn't mind trying that myself. Thanks. |
|
|
|
11/05/2005 01:40:16 PM · #5 |
Fantastic job there soup! They are some great photos! The first two are my favourites. Well framed and well captured! |
|
|
11/05/2005 04:57:46 PM · #6 |
thanks again! i'm thinking of going into pet photography as a side biz in the near future possibly, haven't made my mind up yet...
|
|
|
11/05/2005 05:54:39 PM · #7 |
here is a quick re-edit of this with a different black point set - does anyone else see the banding?

|
|
|
11/06/2005 10:26:49 AM · #8 |
../
Message edited by author 2005-11-06 18:33:35.
|
|
|
11/06/2005 10:28:26 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by soup: here is another re-edit.
|
left comment.
Message edited by author 2005-11-06 10:28:51.
|
|
|
11/06/2005 04:17:05 PM · #10 |
is that a bad or good thing?
|
|
|
11/07/2005 11:12:07 PM · #11 |
-1.3 stops?
Did you get to that by chimping, or do you have some magical rule of thumb working for you on that one?
Cheers, Me.
|
|
|
11/07/2005 11:28:35 PM · #12 |
what do you mean?
the 550ex was already set to -1.3 - same as i had it set for the other shots.
ask les claypool ' is it luck? '
|
|
|
11/08/2005 02:10:19 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by soup: what do you mean?
the 550ex was already set to -1.3 - same as i had it set for the other shots.
|
I was just wondering why you had it down 1.3 stops... With the 580ex I find +2/3rds gives best results in evaluative, and 0 in average mode.
I like the rim lit shot, BTW. :-).
|
|
|
11/08/2005 09:08:17 AM · #14 |
the distance to subject in all likelihood is the reason for the different exposure settings between you and i. the flash was pretty close to the dog. i don't know what chimping means ;}
thanks.
|
|
|
11/08/2005 02:01:23 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by soup: the distance to subject in all likelihood is the reason for the different exposure settings between you and i. the flash was pretty close to the dog. i don't know what chimping means ;}
thanks. |
Urr. u mean that the -1.3stops wasn't on fec? (Flash exposure comp) You set that, it's nothing to do with subject. Ah well, I'm confused, I'll crawl back under my rock... :-).
|
|
|
11/08/2005 02:46:50 PM · #16 |
hmm - well my camera doesn't have FEC...
i am not running the HACK.
but you can do the same thing with the flash itself. so i set the FEC on the flash not on the camera, and it was set to -1.3 stops.
for instance on the 20d camera you could set the FEC at +2 & on the 580ex you could set the FEC at -2. giving you a total of 0 for the FEC value.
|
|
|
11/08/2005 03:57:05 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by soup: hmm - well my camera doesn't have FEC...
i am not running the HACK.
but you can do the same thing with the flash itself. so i set the FEC on the flash not on the camera, and it was set to -1.3 stops.
for instance on the 20d camera you could set the FEC at +2 & on the 580ex you could set the FEC at -2. giving you a total of 0 for the FEC value. |
Arrr, I had missed the point that you were on a 300D. Which leads me back to my original question.......
What lead you to set -1.3 stops? Guestimate, chimping, or random act of button pushing?
Cheers, Me.
|
|
|
11/08/2005 04:19:21 PM · #18 |
well a couple test shots - and then i shot 15 or so shots leaving it set at -1.3.
with a portable ETTL flash ( off camera ) you have aperture, flash power, and flash distance to control exposure.
with out the flash you have aperture, shutter speed, and ISO.
|
|
|
11/08/2005 04:20:39 PM · #19 |
i still don't know what chimping means...
|
|
|
11/08/2005 05:04:30 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by soup: i still don't know what chimping means... |
Either he means monkeying around or bracketing.... Not to sure either to be honest with you...
I think all they want to know is how you came up with such a dramatic stop compensation. Many tests and different exposures or just a guess. |
|
|
11/08/2005 05:14:47 PM · #21 |
chimping is repeatedly checking the photos you took on the lcd right after u shoot it. I think he means, did you shoot, look at the photo, and adjust the flash n keep doin that (ie through trial and error) |
|
|
11/08/2005 09:24:09 PM · #22 |
the -1.3 setting worked with the flash and the ambient light - i set up the rim light shot with the same settings, but shut the ambient light off - that shot was the result - plus a black point adjustment.
i am always monkeying around, i try not to chimp ;}
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/20/2025 08:22:16 AM EDT.