Author | Thread |
|
11/01/2005 10:58:46 AM · #76 |
put in my req. at my fav. shop in Mtl. 1999$Cnd
canceled my D2x order (would have been in in 2 weeks :(
but can't justify the (in my eyes) small incremental up side of the D2x for nearly 2800$
but of course there is other ways to burn the cash i had for the D2x ....
17-55mm 2.8 is calling me ;)
|
|
|
11/01/2005 11:09:14 AM · #77 |
.. nevermind
Message edited by author 2005-11-01 11:10:12.
|
|
|
11/01/2005 11:15:16 AM · #78 |
NYC is a very expensive city so as I figure it...if I stay indoors for 2-3 days/nights I will have saved enough, there alone, to get the D200.
I like the way they put the ISO, WB up by the mode selector and the bigger LCD is a dream...not the mention the extra pixels and 5fps.
Woof!
btw, looks like the ISO is 100-1600
Message edited by author 2005-11-01 11:20:04. |
|
|
11/01/2005 11:34:20 AM · #79 |
Originally posted by pawdrix: NYC is a very expensive city so as I figure it...if I stay indoors for 2-3 days/nights I will have saved enough, there alone, to get the D200. |
Do you have champagne and caviar for dinner every night?
|
|
|
11/01/2005 11:44:10 AM · #80 |
Jumping on the upgrade bandwagon as well. 5 fps raw for 22 frames, 10 mp and 11 area af have me sold.
|
|
|
11/01/2005 11:52:32 AM · #81 |
The 11 focus areas are sooooooo tempting. |
|
|
11/01/2005 11:54:24 AM · #82 |
that is not a $1300 dollar body. it is a 1300 POUND, 1,940 EURO body.
puts it more into the $2,400 range, US.
|
|
|
11/01/2005 11:59:10 AM · #83 |
dpreview.com says; "Best of all is the price, body-only, $1,849 in the US."
And that's probably RRP, which means street prices will be lower. |
|
|
11/01/2005 12:05:49 PM · #84 |
D200 body only: £1299.99 / €1940
D200 & 18-70mm: £1499.99 / €2240
D200 & 17-55mm: £2299.99 / €3435
must be the european pricing only then. That is significantly more than the US price.
|
|
|
11/01/2005 12:07:01 PM · #85 |
Originally posted by jhonan: Originally posted by pawdrix: NYC is a very expensive city so as I figure it...if I stay indoors for 2-3 days/nights I will have saved enough, there alone, to get the D200. |
Do you have champagne and caviar for dinner every night? |
YES!
Champagne Wishes and Caviar Dreams...24/7! |
|
|
11/01/2005 12:08:46 PM · #86 |
Originally posted by th3ph17: must be the european pricing only then. That is significantly more than the US price. |
Isn't that always the case? :)
I think street prices will be less than that; they're probably MRRP in that table.
Lots of D100's and D70's on ebay in December...
|
|
|
11/01/2005 12:11:39 PM · #87 |
I was sold with ISO 100 and vertical grip. :-) The rest is just icing on the cake!! |
|
|
11/01/2005 12:15:47 PM · #88 |
and, "Magnesium alloy, Body seams sealed", wish Canon would offer weather sealing for its 5D and 20d.
|
|
|
11/01/2005 12:16:00 PM · #89 |
You probably already know this but Nikon USA in their site is suggesting $1699.95. Wolf Camera is accepting pre orders for the same price (available mid December). Don't know about B and H and other shops.
Merry Christmas to me!
Originally posted by th3ph17: D200 body only: £1299.99 / €1940
D200 & 18-70mm: £1499.99 / €2240
D200 & 17-55mm: £2299.99 / €3435
must be the european pricing only then. That is significantly more than the US price. |
Message edited by author 2005-11-01 12:17:08. |
|
|
11/01/2005 12:16:46 PM · #90 |
Phil's preview on //www.dpreview.com mentioned several time a price of $1699. If I needed another camera, I'd be picking one up :-)
-danny
|
|
|
11/01/2005 12:18:39 PM · #91 |
Nikon's got it set at $1699 USD. That should be pretty close to accurate, give or take a few dollars.
I'm freakin out because this thing has got everything that the D70 lacks, that I've been wanting...extra cheese, gravy...onions... |
|
|
11/01/2005 12:21:54 PM · #92 |
I know this sounds like a small thing; the AI aperture ring... what a great idea including that! I thought Nikon had left all their AI customers behind.
dpreview:
"Thanks to its new AI aperture ring connector the D200 supports A / M modes and metering with AI manual focus lenses (essentially anything made since 1977)." |
|
|
11/01/2005 12:39:49 PM · #93 |
Everything looks great. Seems like Nikon did a great job. Only thing I would like is faster flash sync speed. I'm surprised that they can have 1/500 in D70 but not in D200.
I wonder what actually limits sync speed. Anyone?
Nick
|
|
|
11/01/2005 01:11:17 PM · #94 |
Originally posted by Nikolai1024: Everything looks great. Seems like Nikon did a great job. Only thing I would like is faster flash sync speed. I'm surprised that they can have 1/500 in D70 but not in D200.
I wonder what actually limits sync speed. Anyone?
Nick |
The speed that the slit in the focal-plane shutter curtain travels at. Synch speed has to be set to allow full coverage of the sensor area during the time that the flash is emiting light.
R.
|
|
|
11/01/2005 01:23:57 PM · #95 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
The speed that the slit in the focal-plane shutter curtain travels at. Synch speed has to be set to allow full coverage of the sensor area during the time that the flash is emiting light.
R. |
That is true on traditional cameras, but not on cameras such as the D70. The D70 has the same basic shutter as the D100 which syncs @ 1/180 max. The D70 has an electronic "shutter" which allows the faster sync speed. With my studio strobes my D70 will sync over 1/1000. |
|
|
11/01/2005 02:09:32 PM · #96 |
Originally posted by hyperfocal: Originally posted by bear_music:
The speed that the slit in the focal-plane shutter curtain travels at. Synch speed has to be set to allow full coverage of the sensor area during the time that the flash is emiting light.
R. |
That is true on traditional cameras, but not on cameras such as the D70. The D70 has the same basic shutter as the D100 which syncs @ 1/180 max. The D70 has an electronic "shutter" which allows the faster sync speed. With my studio strobes my D70 will sync over 1/1000. |
Live and learn :-)
More proof that I don't know everything, jejejeâ„¢
R.
|
|
|
11/01/2005 03:36:54 PM · #97 |
I was so hoping the rumurs that the D200 would share the doubling mode (2x crop factor with half the MP) with the D2x were true. I see they are not so I guess I will save a few bucks for the time being. I do quite a bit of long lens work, shoot birds and such, and need the reach and speed. I guess they did not want to get to close to the D2x. Great body for the money anyway. |
|
|
11/01/2005 04:09:49 PM · #98 |
Originally posted by jbsmithana: I was so hoping the rumurs that the D200 would share the doubling mode (2x crop factor with half the MP) with the D2x were true. I see they are not so I guess I will save a few bucks for the time being. I do quite a bit of long lens work, shoot birds and such, and need the reach and speed. I guess they did not want to get to close to the D2x. Great body for the money anyway. |
Actually all the crop mode does is that it focusses on a smaller part of the sensor (like a digital zoom). The only advantage is for fast multiple exposures like sports. Weather you shoot a bird in "regular" mode or crop mode, nothing changes as you can then crop the full 12mp image down to 6mp in post processing.
|
|
|
11/01/2005 04:18:02 PM · #99 |
For what it's worth, a 2x crop factor is 1/4 the megapixels... So if you had a 6x4, 12Mp image and cropped it to 3x2, it would have 3 Mp, not 6 Mp.
3x2=6, 6x4=24, 24/4=6
Robt.
|
|
|
11/01/2005 04:24:27 PM · #100 |
Originally posted by bear_music: For what it's worth, a 2x crop factor is 1/4 the megapixels... So if you had a 6x4, 12Mp image and cropped it to 3x2, it would have 3 Mp, not 6 Mp.
3x2=6, 6x4=24, 24/4=6
Robt. |
Yah,,But...the crop mode for the D2x (and I guess for the D200 is already 1.5) at normal shoot. So kosmikkreeper is actually right about the "just crop it from the norm" response. Cropping from a 12 meg file to get 50% closer I actually get to keep an 8 meg photo instead of a 6 meg photo
I only go to crop mode when I need the extra speed and that is like..never :-) 5 frames a sec at 12 megapixels is plenty fast..an extra 3 frames a second and give up to half my resolution is not for me.
Message edited by author 2005-11-01 16:26:00. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/03/2025 02:14:21 AM EDT.