The diference between art and snapshoot

09/05/2005 07:50:07 PM · #101

Originally posted by azoychka:

gore etc

That has always existed in society.

09/05/2005 07:52:59 PM · #102

Originally posted by nsbca7:

Originally posted by azoychka:
gore etc

That has always existed in society.

what is "gore"?

09/05/2005 07:55:22 PM · #103

Originally posted by undieyatch:

Originally posted by nsbca7:

Originally posted by azoychka:
gore etc

That has always existed in society.

what is "gore"?

Ex vice president of the United States who lost his bid for presidency by a Supreme Court decision in 2000.

09/05/2005 07:56:34 PM · #104

Originally posted by nsbca7:

Originally posted by azoychka:

Originally posted by tomzinho:

Originally posted by azoychka:
Diane Arbus would 'lose' here, no black vacant background!

and how about #1 american artist badboy matthew barney (here and here). at least his images are usually very high quality from a techincal perspective.
(warning - somewhat disturbing)

He sure fits todays society.......

yes ha ha and this is 'gore' too.......

...todays society...?

09/05/2005 08:09:08 PM · #105

Originally posted by nsbca7:

Originally posted by undieyatch:

Originally posted by nsbca7:

Originally posted by azoychka:
gore etc

That has always existed in society.

what is "gore"?

Ex vice president of the United States who lost his bid for presidency by a Supreme Court decision in 2000.

Thanks for the enlightenment - A mysterious reference in a dialogue about kitch vs. art.
I don't get it.

09/05/2005 08:17:24 PM · #106

nsbca7 posted a link to photos by matthew Barney which are graphic. I said it fits todays society...gore, you know shock stuff. Nothing too deep in it all

09/05/2005 08:26:54 PM · #107

Originally posted by azoychka:

nsbca7 posted a link to photos by matthew Barney which are graphic. I said it fits todays society...gore, you know shock stuff. Nothing too deep in it all

oh yes "Blood, especially coagulated blood from a wound." It must have slipped my mind that Battilana seldom makes much sense.

09/05/2005 08:29:34 PM · #108

Originally posted by azoychka:

nsbca7 posted a link to photos by matthew Barney...

No I didn't!

09/05/2005 08:33:19 PM · #109

Originally posted by undieyatch:

Originally posted by azoychka:
nsbca7 posted a link to photos by matthew Barney which are graphic. I said it fits todays society...gore, you know shock stuff. Nothing too deep in it all

oh yes "Blood, especially coagulated blood from a wound." It must have slipped my mind that Battilana seldom makes much sense.

It went over your head.

09/05/2005 08:33:51 PM · #110

Oh sorry I apologize. I confused a very confusing quote lie. Wonder who did?

09/05/2005 08:37:17 PM · #111

Originally posted by azoychka:

Oh sorry I apologize. I confused a very confusing quote lie. Wonder who did?

Who did is not relevent. The fact is that element of art (gore, shock value) has alway been a part of society. It is nothing new.

09/05/2005 08:46:50 PM · #112

It plays only a small part thank goodness, other than in the movies and on TV.

09/05/2005 08:46:55 PM · #113

Oh good your back on subject.... apologize for the side track. Yup, gore went right over my head.

09/05/2005 08:48:15 PM · #114

and the subject was......

Originally posted by Nuno:

Unfortunatly not everyone recognises photograph as an art form (especially galleries!). Just a photo. People give towsands of bucks to have a Dali painting in the livingroom or a Monet in the hall but how many people exibit proudly an Ansel Adams print?

In your opinion what makes a photograph a piece of art, and not just a mere photo. The technique? The sense of oportunity? The tipe of print? Creativity?

Please post your opinion and personal experiense if yiu have any of exibition and selling prints, along with advices to achieve the art form, or at least more lellable prints. :)

We, the less experienced will aprecciate and assimilate the wisedom of the masters. Tanks in advance.