DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> General Discussion >> Rucksack packing Q
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 8 of 8, (reverse)
AuthorThread
09/03/2005 04:12:40 PM · #1
Well, have spent the last hour trying to pack my Lowepro Photo Trekker AWII and have a couple of Q's. Am off to the Isle of Mull for 9 days at the end of the month for a walking holiday :) and will be packing all my gear, bar 3 lenses (it just about fits in)

I started packing it with what I think will be my 2 most used lenses attached to the 300D and 20D - I'm now thinking thats not such a good idea?

I'd like to keep the layout the same throughout the holiday, sense tells me to pack the heavy gear at the bottom with the lighter stuff above but whilst walking I'll probably have both cams around my neck, meaning there would be a large void in the bottom of the bag (is this safe? comfortable?).

Would love any tips/ideas from peeps with rucksacks and with those with too much time on their hands this is what is going into the rucksack...

20D +BG
300D +BG
100-400 IS L
70-200 F/4L
100mm F/2.8 Macro
24-70 F/2.8 L
17-40 F/4 L
10-22
50mm F/1.8 MKI
1.4 converter
set of 3 Kenko extension tubes
20gb Flashtrax
Lee filter bag (0.6 GND + fittings).

I'll be sticking the Manfrotto 144B pod and 1288C head on the side and probably take the Giotto monopod as a walking stick ;)

Might seem like overkill but I want to be prepared for anything :)

Thanks in advance :)


09/03/2005 04:15:19 PM · #2
Don't forget the batteries and chargers.
09/03/2005 04:19:41 PM · #3
Originally posted by faidoi:

Don't forget the batteries and chargers.


lol, they will be packed with my shorts and T-shirts :)
09/03/2005 04:24:23 PM · #4
With all that load do you think you'll make it trough there? :)

I would love one of the Lowepro backpacks that are waterproof... Lot of money though. I ue a stealth reporter aw from lowepro, and all things are in the same level... So I can't be a great help. I got thins intead of the backpack because I can introduce my hand from the top zipper and grab a lens quick. In the terrain is not so quick after all :(
09/03/2005 04:31:19 PM · #5
Originally posted by Nuno:

With all that load do you think you'll make it trough there? :)


Good point Nuno, I'm not a muscleman and won't be doing 20 mile walks each day ;) am thinking more of shorter walks with plenty of refreshment breaks!The phototrekker has a full waterproof cover hidden in the bottom and a daypack for my waterproofs etc. Have tried it on fully laden and although it is HEAVY it has an excellent harness and balances the weight well.
09/04/2005 11:51:46 AM · #6
It is not overkill :D I often carry a Lowepro Super Trekker AW (the really huge bag) with Nikon FA, F4S and F5, 300mm f2.8, 80-400VR, 70-180 Micro-Nikkor, 55mm, 35mmPC, 28mm, 24mm, 20mm, 2x converter, loads of filters, speedlight, food, water, survival kit, first aid kit... and film ;) ... oh and a coolpix just in case.

"Received wisdom" in packing and carrying rucksacks is to put the heavier stuff at the top to load your shoulders more than your hips. The downside to that is that too much weight above the shoulder can make you unstable in high winds or when climbing, descending or just clambering over gates and fences.

Personally I like to distribute the weight fairly evenly around the pack with the most-used camera and lens set up positioned top-centre. Not only is it easier to get that camera out without undoing everything but it also means the laod is still well distributed if I keep the camera out and walk with it or stand around with the pack on.

Don't wear both cameras around your neck, especially with the 100-400 and 70-200 dangling off them. You'll get fatigue in the neck from that while you've got a perfectly good rucksack on your back :)

Roger
09/04/2005 12:05:45 PM · #7
My humble advice:
First, I have no idea what kind of photography you are planning, but 2 cameras? Both with battery grips?
I would also leave either the 100-400 or 70-200, probably the 70-200. And the 17-40, too much overlap with the 24-70.
Even with breaks, every kg. counts. And I assume that you will be walking almost every day. The first days will be ok, but it will start to wear you down, unless you are very fit. :)

09/17/2005 03:23:06 PM · #8
Thanks for the comments. Currently the 70-200 is out of the packing list. My main goal is for landscapes so the 10-22 and 17-40 are staying (the 10-22 isn't happy with filters at the 10mm end). I don't plan on taking many midrange shots so I may well leave the 24-70 at home but that leaves a big gap from 50-100mm (it is a heavy lens).

2 cameras is a must! on a (reasonably) remote Island if the 20D goes lala I'd be stuck in a pub (maybe not such a bad thing). I take your point about taking both grips though ;)
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 01/16/2026 07:08:29 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/16/2026 07:08:29 AM EST.