| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/02/2005 02:19:30 PM · #1 |
what is the advantage of a slow lens, ie. say a 300mm 6.8f, compared to a 5.6f.
thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
09/02/2005 02:20:29 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
09/02/2005 02:38:24 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by swinging_johnson_v1:
what is the advantage of a slow lens, ie. say a 300mm 6.8f, compared to a 5.6f.
thanks in advance. |
size. ;-)
Joke apart, you don't have any advantage from a slow lens from a photographic standpoint.
|
|
|
|
09/02/2005 05:51:40 PM · #4 |
Size, weight, price. I can't think of any others.
I've got a couple of 300mm f4.5 Nikkor lenses which are about a fifth the volume of my 300mm f2.8 Nikkor. Probably a fifth of the price and certainly more manageable. I wouldn't want to hand-hold the 2.8 ;)
Roger |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/25/2025 07:51:29 AM EDT.
