Author | Thread |
|
08/04/2005 10:54:42 AM · #1 |
I originaly bought my 24-70 from amazon.com, but then they emailed me and said i needed more verification to use my card, so i called and they told me it was going to take 3-5 buisness days to get the verification from my cc company. so i told them forget it i want to cancel, they said no problem cancled, so i went and bought it somewhere els and received it yesterdays, then i got home in and checked my email and what did it say, YOUR ORDER HAS SHIPPED, ha lol so now i have 2
24-70 lenses, obvioulsy im going to send one back, but, wow, to have to sitting in my house is great,
just something to share,
|
|
|
08/04/2005 10:59:43 AM · #2 |
Originally posted by TroyMosley: I originaly bought my 24-70 from amazon.com, but then they emailed me and said i needed more verification to use my card, so i called and they told me it was going to take 3-5 buisness days to get the verification from my cc company. so i told them forget it i want to cancel, they said no problem cancled, so i went and bought it somewhere els and received it yesterdays, then i got home in and checked my email and what did it say, YOUR ORDER HAS SHIPPED, ha lol so now i have 2
24-70 lenses, obvioulsy im going to send one back, but, wow, to have to sitting in my house is great,
just something to share, |
Exact same thing happened to me - when I ordered my Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 online, then went out and bought one 'cause I couldn't wait 3 weeks! Now we have 1 for the 20D, and 1 for the 10D - worked out great! |
|
|
08/04/2005 11:17:51 AM · #3 |
Gee, with shipping costs and the hassle and all...you'd be better off just selling it to me for oh, say...$600? |
|
|
08/04/2005 11:33:57 AM · #4 |
theres no way there getting me to pay for shipping it back to them,
|
|
|
08/04/2005 11:37:20 AM · #5 |
Quick, whole you have both, do some testing and see if one performs visibly better than the other. Test at 24mm ad 70mm at f/2.8. Look at sharpness in corners and center of frame, and also do a test for CA, e.g. dark, fine branches against bright sky.
|
|
|
08/04/2005 11:54:31 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by kirbic: Quick, whole you have both, do some testing and see if one performs visibly better than the other. Test at 24mm ad 70mm at f/2.8. Look at sharpness in corners and center of frame, and also do a test for CA, e.g. dark, fine branches against bright sky. |
Yep, I agree...Canon is not known for consistency in QC so chances are that one lens is a better 'copy' than the other...keep the winner, I say! |
|
|
08/04/2005 12:00:54 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by thatcloudthere: Originally posted by kirbic: Quick, whole you have both, do some testing and see if one performs visibly better than the other. Test at 24mm ad 70mm at f/2.8. Look at sharpness in corners and center of frame, and also do a test for CA, e.g. dark, fine branches against bright sky. |
Yep, I agree...Canon is not known for consistency in QC so chances are that one lens is a better 'copy' than the other...keep the winner, I say! |
looks like kirbic is very experienced. :D
Message edited by author 2005-08-04 12:01:40. |
|
|
08/04/2005 12:07:08 PM · #8 |
maybe i will do that, sound like fun, to do some testing,
|
|
|
08/04/2005 07:57:19 PM · #9 |
Really quick, If any of you are interested in buying it before i send it back, PM me, i will sell it to you for the same price i got it from amazon.com, i wont even open the box, you can be the first to touch such a outstanding lens.
|
|
|
08/06/2005 09:32:03 PM · #10 |
I'd be interested in seeing if there is a noticible difference between the two lenses. If you see any, maybe you can post them.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/19/2025 02:13:19 PM EDT.