| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/07/2005 04:38:10 PM · #1 |
Taken in the fog, straight from camera.
This was taken by my brother in-law and he thinks it's fantastic, so I thought I would try some of your honest opinions on it I told him I would put it up for Critque
Thanks
Message edited by author 2005-07-07 16:41:14. |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 04:40:30 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 04:48:13 PM · #3 |
| me too ... all soft and dreamy |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 04:53:17 PM · #4 |
Very nice. Definitely a keeper. :D
Some post-processing to bump the subtle detail may improve it somewhat. |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 05:02:19 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by PollyBean:
Very nice. Definitely a keeper. :D
Some post-processing to bump the subtle detail may improve it somewhat. |
ditto...exactly what i was going to say ;-)
 |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 05:19:07 PM · #6 |
| very nice, although i think that's too much post processing. any processing on something like this would need to be subtle. |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 05:22:26 PM · #7 |
It appears to be slightly under exposed. A slight levels or curves adjustment should be able to take care of that.
If you have PS CS2 you can use the exposure adjustment.
|
|
|
|
07/07/2005 05:31:20 PM · #8 |
| If the original was shot in RAW format, make sure your brother-in-law works the levels in 16-bit mode and converts to 8-bit mode just before saving jpg. Helps a lot for smoother tone gradation. |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 05:34:30 PM · #9 |
The soft/subtle colors are nice, but I think it does need more in the way of contrast - it's hard to discern much from the original.
|
|
|
|
07/07/2005 05:39:24 PM · #10 |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 05:52:16 PM · #11 |
I like it. It's has a nice calming feel. A bit more detail/contrast would help. I also like it as a duotone.
|
|
|
|
07/07/2005 06:56:02 PM · #12 |
Thanks for that! interesting!
I thought it looked rather flat myself, but that is just me, so I told him I would get some more professional opinions
Any more responses please
Please
Message edited by author 2005-07-07 20:33:06. |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 08:34:24 PM · #13 |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 08:40:04 PM · #14 |
| I THINK ITS BEAUTIFUL........... |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 10:30:10 PM · #15 |
I did a quick adjustment with PS CS2 - exposure +.40, offset -1.3, highlights and shadows. I realize there are a lot of artifacts due to re-editing a jpg (as well as probably overdoing the pp).
|
|
|
|
07/07/2005 10:33:05 PM · #16 |
| the layers of the fog is too soft, cant really see much unless try really hard |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 10:46:03 PM · #17 |
| I fiddled with it, too, and came to the conclusion that the posted image is not high enough quality to fiddle with without introducing TONS of artifacts. Neat image fixed most of them nicely, but I was left with the feeling that the original was really quite nice without all the fiddling..... |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 10:54:16 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by cpanaioti:
I did a quick adjustment with PS CS2 - exposure +.40, offset -1.3, highlights and shadows. I realize there are a lot of artifacts due to re-editing a jpg (as well as probably overdoing the pp).
|
text
Ran it though Neat Image
 |
|
|
|
07/07/2005 11:06:46 PM · #19 |
What happened to the other picture in your portfolio? #200353?
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/21/2025 10:31:27 AM EDT.
