| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/13/2005 11:50:46 AM · #1 |
Q1) Beside price, is there a significant difference between the two macro lenses Nikkor 105mm D & Sigma 105mm? If budget isn't an issue, which macro lese would u prefer to buy for ur Nikon DSLR?
Q2) Also looking for a good wide angle lense and wonder if anyone has used Nikon's AF-S 12-24mm f/4G DX ED-IF ? Is there a better option available?
|
|
|
|
05/13/2005 11:55:18 AM · #2 |
//www.fredmiranda.com has lens reviews.
Personal experiences from users here could also be helpful.
For macro you could also consider the Tamron 90mm.
|
|
|
|
05/13/2005 05:06:56 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by cpanaioti:
//www.fredmiranda.com has lens reviews.
Personal experiences from users here could also be helpful.
For macro you could also consider the Tamron 90mm. |
Thanks
|
|
|
|
05/13/2005 05:24:33 PM · #4 |
I have the Sigma 105mm F2.8, and it's WONDERFUL! Most of my latest pictures have been taken with that lens, it's reduced sensor dust a lot, because I hardly ever change the lens anymore. I love it for people pictures too.
|
|
|
|
05/13/2005 05:30:18 PM · #5 |
| I have the sigma 105mm also and find it to be an excellent lens. Some people will only buy Nikkor lenses just like some people will only buy Canon lenses, it's a personal choice. Other wide angle choices in the same size (12-24) would be Sigma and Tokina. The Tokina 12-24 came out recently and is currently (as far as I'm aware) the cheapest at 500 USD and it has had fairly good reviews. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/17/2025 02:35:06 AM EDT.
