| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/11/2005 10:47:54 AM · #151 |
Originally posted by GoldBerry:
Hey I still haven't seen any of the pictures linked by Risquebusiness..none of them work for me. |
Tried to email you one but don't think the attachment took. Funky file or something.
|
|
|
|
02/11/2005 10:59:20 AM · #152 |
Originally posted by nsbca7:
Originally posted by risquebusiness:
Hi all,
I'm a little shy...
Nicola |
Hi, I'm shy. Want to see my boyfriend's hard penis?
Hey. How do we know that these are not really pictures of you? I mean nobody knows who you are. I haven't seen any pictures of you posted on your profile. You’ve never posted here on DP before this thread. How do we know you’re not just an exhibitionist wanting to show his weenie off in public Nicolas?
Just looking for motives, beyond the more obvious I'm a photographer obsessed with penises. |
My thoughts exactly! I have been thinking this from the beginning of this thread.
Barbara
|
|
|
|
02/11/2005 11:12:31 AM · #153 |
Originally posted by nsbca7:
Hey. How do we know that these are not really pictures of you? Just looking for motives, beyond the more obvious I'm a photographer obsessed with penises. |
I really cannot prove otherwise so I guess you're going to have to take my word for it. I am totally aware of why you ask these questions because had I viewed a similar thread then I would probably have doubts in my own mind as to whether the photographer of the shots was in fact the subject of the shots. Even if I did have a picture in my profile, would that confirm 100% that I was female? I think not. One of the main reasons for not revealing what I look like is that the model I use is actually a married man and although his wife doesn't seem to have any immediate problems with me taking shots of him I'd just rather remain as more of an anonymity as such.
The reasons behind never posting before is because I have only been photographing the model for about two weeks as it is a new subject matter I have undertaken 'the male form' and I have interpreted it in the most erotic way possible because this path has rarely been taken before. I have also approached other forums about it and had point blank refusals so it's not like I've just come here to take advantage. I also did ask whether it was okay to post first.
I have to admit that, yes, I do love the male form and cannot deny it, call it an obsessive love of erections if you like!!
I hope that this clears a few doubters and I'm sorry for just barging in like I did. I shall post some nice pictures of stereotypical 'girlie' things just to prove you wrong!
Nicola
Message edited by author 2005-02-11 11:15:07. |
|
|
|
02/11/2005 11:25:43 AM · #154 |
I don't know,
this image you took looks a whole lot like it is coming (no pun intended) from the perspective of the owner.
Are penises the only things you photograph? I mean even Maplethorpe was a bit eclectic with his choice of subject matter.
|
|
|
|
02/12/2005 02:42:37 PM · #155 |
|
|
|
05/12/2005 12:58:23 PM · #156 |
This thread reminds me of the porn video I did not too long ago.
Slippy's porn video.
:-)
|
|
|
|
05/12/2005 01:25:48 PM · #157 |
Hey, guys and dolls, Is all well and fine to have a good time at risquebus... expense (hope she has a good sense of humor). I haven't seen the images in question, the links don't seem to work, don't really need to see them. I can say, I probably would not be overly receptive of "Dick" and "Mary" shots on this site. I either would NOT vote on them or vote them very low for content.
I don't give sh.. what other people do, as long as it does not reflect on me, and/or it is not shoved in my face.
If DPC started accepting these shots, it would take no time before the challenges would be filled with "Mary" triangles, "Dick" I's (accidental letters)and so on. Just think of a challenge "Tasteful" and imagine what you might get on it. (hmmmm???) Many of the good people who use this site would leave, especially those with kids on the site. I think we have too much fun as it is to allow this to happen.
Love the banana shot
Message edited by author 2005-05-12 13:27:11. |
|
|
|
05/13/2005 08:02:06 AM · #158 |
Originally posted by shutterfly:
I'm not a man, but isn't an erection the result of being sexually stimulated? How can that not be in a way pornographic? |
Nah it doesn't mean "sexually stimulated" ask any guy. Sometimes its up before us. Kinda like playing cowboys and indians and sleeping in a teepee. lol
|
|
|
|
05/13/2005 08:12:59 AM · #159 |
| I totally agree with Sofapez. Thank you for your post. We should remember the young registered users on this site. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/21/2025 06:30:39 PM EDT.
