ever get DQ'd for something you didnt do?

04/19/2005 07:58:44 PM · #1

I just did and I'm just a little upset. I got DQ'd for spot editing that I know I sure didnt do. I guess the lighting cant just be good, I MUST have dodged and burned.

04/19/2005 07:59:16 PM · #2

Post the original and the submission.

snackwells

Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di for Canon

04/19/2005 08:02:15 PM · #3

Sorry to hear that. Can we see the original and your entry submission?

04/19/2005 08:02:16 PM · #4

i guess i can now, now that i wont be seeing it getting any more votes

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

04/19/2005 08:06:26 PM · #5

hrmm...did you explain all of your steps fully when you submitted the original?

Travis99

Canon EOS-5D

04/19/2005 08:07:39 PM · #6

I like the original more, you should have went with that.

04/19/2005 08:07:48 PM · #7

you did dodge and burn? that's spot editing, not allowed in basic eiting challenge.

04/19/2005 08:07:55 PM · #8

i cant give exact numbers to what i did, but i did go through the steps and tools i used

04/19/2005 08:08:36 PM · #9

Originally posted by frumoaznicul:

you did dodge and burn? that's spot editing, not allowed in basic eiting challenge.

I think he's saying he didn't dodge and burn.

04/19/2005 08:08:51 PM · #10

Originally posted by frumoaznicul:

you did dodge and burn? that's spot editing, not allowed in basic eiting challenge.

i was being sarcastic with my first post, silly

04/19/2005 08:10:27 PM · #11

ah ok I didn't get the sarcasm :)

04/19/2005 08:10:28 PM · #12

maybe i should've stuck with the color, but right now im into contrasty B&W for some reason

Cam

Sony DSC-F717

04/19/2005 08:12:42 PM · #13

There is a bit of a halo around the decaying tower, that would not happen if you just changed from color to B @ W....or at least I dont think it could.

Edit ...CJ was faster.

Message edited by author 2005-04-19 20:14:19.

Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS

04/19/2005 08:14:04 PM · #14

Halo can apear when you do shadow&highlight adjust in PS CS and many other circumstancess that are applied to the whole image and I think is legal.

kirbic

Canon EOS R5

04/19/2005 08:15:59 PM · #15

Originally posted by frumoaznicul:

Halo can apear when you do shadow&highlight adjust in PS CS and many other circumstancess that are applied to the whole image and I think is legal.

The root of the issue was that no such steps were specified, and the halo does not appear as one would expect from any of those tools (I tried them).

BAMartin

Apple iPhone 5

04/19/2005 08:16:39 PM · #16

I am not saying you chEAted, but I downloaded your origional photo and played with it in photoshop and i could not duplicate your submission. Maybe if you gave the SC a little more to work with (IE, steps takem, etc.)

Barbara

04/19/2005 08:17:52 PM · #17

I see, I don't know then, weska maybe you post all your steps too here.

04/19/2005 08:21:45 PM · #18

Originally posted by BAMartin:

I must say I played with it too and not even with shadow&highlight that usualy creates such halo on low radius I couldnt get it. Weird but anyways I don't see why anyone would add such halo on purpose, so I belive him.

04/19/2005 08:31:12 PM · #19

Originally posted by frumoaznicul:

Originally posted by BAMartin:
I am not saying you chEAted, but I downloaded your origional photo and played with it in photoshop and i could not duplicate your submission. Maybe if you gave the SC a little more to work with (IE, steps takem, etc.)

Barbara

I must say I played with it too and not even with shadow&highlight that usualy creates such halo on low radius I couldnt get it. Weird but anyways I don't see why anyone would add such halo on purpose, so I belive him.

besides, i wouldnt go into the rant forum and bitch and moan if i deserved the DQ. it's funny because I'M having trouble duplicating it. I guess from now on i'll save it in photoshop format too, instead of just saving the original and the submission. lesson learned, i guess

04/19/2005 08:36:29 PM · #20

yea do that! I always keep them all in a folder the original with exif the psd and different edited final jpg's.

04/19/2005 08:44:54 PM · #21

i figured it out. here's what to do:

convert to greyscale
auto levels
unsharp mask (!) - amount 176%
- Radius 94.3 pixels
- threshold 28 levels
brightness -13
contrast +8
sharpen
crop

and you get what i submitted, or very damn colse

edit: even though it's obvious, i added the "crop" step

Message edited by author 2005-04-19 20:46:34.

04/19/2005 08:48:28 PM · #22

i'd like to officially apologise for this bitching and wasting everyone's time. it was my fault, i forgot that all important step when i gave my steps

04/19/2005 08:49:28 PM · #23

Well, I must say that I have an entry currently that was questionable. Mine too was suggested for validation, but I clearly listed all the steps I took when I submitted the original and the site council validated my photo in no time.

It's a shame that yours got DQ'd, but in reality, you can't be angry at the site council (believe me, they tried to duplicate your effects) -- just try to remember ALL the steps next time. I'm not trying to start an arguement here, and I'm on your side, believe me...just saying pay closer attention next time to your post-processing steps. Don't let it discourage you -- learn from it and keep shooting!