DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register) 
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Challenge Results >> Good Duck, Bad Duck
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 6 of 6, (reverse)
AuthorThread
 04/09/2005 09:45:58 PM · #1
Well as often happens, I got the entry down to 2 shots and then picked one - I don't even remember why. It didn't do too well (39th) - probably because of technical issues (focus, dof, etc.), but wanted to get opinions on the outtake vs. the entry...

Entered this: Grapes of Bath


Coulda (shoulda?) entered this:


Thanks to all who commented by the way! In case anyone wondered about the lighting, it was all professional, studio setup stuff:


I had a frisbee full of water resting on top of a clip on shop light in front of my garage. At one point, I bumped the frisbee and water sloshed down into the lamp and tripped the breaker. I know...what were you thinking??! :)
 04/10/2005 02:50:32 AM · #2
thump- er, I mean "bump"
 04/10/2005 03:01:26 AM · #3
I liked your shot but I feel the the soft touch and DOF is what brought your score down. Now that's just my opinion. I think that some of the voters may have felt your aperture was outside of the limits. A larger depth of field with a sharper picture would of been better IMO. And maybe the duck at a 45 deg. angle instead of straight on. I know that would of caused you to take a higher POV picture to get all five green grapes in but I think it would of been a better composition.
Just my 2 cents.
I like your lighting setup and thank you for sharing it with us.
 04/10/2005 03:10:02 AM · #4
Originally posted by SDW65:
I liked your shot but I feel the the soft touch and DOF is what brought your score down. Now that's just my opinion. I think that some of the voters may have felt your aperture was outside of the limits. A larger depth of field with a sharper picture would of been better IMO. And maybe the duck at a 45 deg. angle instead of straight on. I know that would of caused you to take a higher POV picture to get all five green grapes in but I think it would of been a better composition.
Just my 2 cents.
I like your lighting setup and thank you for sharing it with us.


Thanks Scott. Aperture was 6.3

I appreciate the feedback.

Message edited by author 2005-04-10 03:16:17.
 04/10/2005 11:22:17 PM · #5
Left a comment. =]
 04/12/2005 09:19:34 PM · #6
Originally posted by kpriest:
it was all professional, studio setup stuff:


Looks like the same professional studio setup package I use (although, with that metal lampy-thing, it looks like you bought the Deluxe Kit!)

Having said that, I worried about sounding foolish, just in case that really was professional (what do I know? a user of cardboard boxes, a blanket, and a flashlight!)

So, just in case, I headed for your profile (it was worth the trip!) I don't know what made laugh more - your self-description, your dissertation on how you comment / vote, or your photographs. You are one funny man, Ken. "Thinking Too Much", "Addicted", and your pet portrait (the portrait being the "inside" joke) were just too, too funny.

I look forward to more chuckle-inducing works from you. Kathy
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 10/18/2025 12:20:09 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/18/2025 12:20:09 PM EDT.