| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/16/2005 02:27:33 PM · #1 |
| This article, "Putting a Price on Photography", was in The New York Times today and I thought some people here might find it interesting. Read the Article |
|
|
|
03/16/2005 02:30:38 PM · #2 |
I could be wrong but I feel as if the price of photos may go down as technology advances. Does anyone else feel the same?
Originally posted by sammy_stecchino:
This article, "Putting a Price on Photography", was in The New York Times today and I thought some people here might find it interesting. Read the Article |
|
|
|
|
03/16/2005 02:31:05 PM · #3 |
"Anyone looking for the logic to that will end up mumbling to himself over a bottle of scotch for years to come"
To quote the end of the article. Quite right, too.
E |
|
|
|
03/16/2005 09:09:32 PM · #4 |
[quote=eostyles] I could be wrong but I feel as if the price of photos may go down as technology advances. Does anyone else feel the same?
Actually, like the article mentions, the bigger photos (those more like paintings) are priced more like paintings. So advances in hardware (quality of digital pics, resolution, etc.) makes larger format better. But with advances in programs I think it might help out because a photographer can be more creative. That is, not so much for improving that specific image as creating an overall piece of art (combining images, montage, color manipulation, texturized effects). The bottom line in art is that there is a final product the artist has in mind, when that product is no longer limited to what can be seen through the lense then the artistic value of photography increases. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/16/2025 02:42:36 AM EDT.
