DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> i9900 vs. R1800
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 5 of 5, (reverse)
AuthorThread
02/15/2005 09:19:55 AM · #1
i9900

Pros:
Fast
very wide gamut/brilliant colours
very little metamerism
user replaceable print-head cartridge
individual inks

Cons:
not roll compatable
print longevity issues

R1800

Pros:
print longevity
roll compatable
individual inks

Cons:
more expensive inks
slower
fixed print-head(I think)

I'm considering one of these two printers. The i9900 has been around for nearly a year and mostly what I've heard has been positive. The R1800 isn't even out yet but is supposed to ship in March. The closest thing the R1800 can be compared to is the smaller format R800 - both are based on the same print technology and use the same inks. The i9900 and the R1800 will be very comparable price-wise.

Any Canon and Epson users want to make a case for either product, to help me decide?

02/15/2005 09:59:19 AM · #2
Owen, I've had two Epsons and now a Canon, and I would not buy another Epson. My $500 Epson 1200 was a pain in the butt, running countless cleaning cycles even when installing a new cartridge.

After 1 year of very light use, it broke. The carriage started banging on the end of the shaft. Epson told me I was out of luck because I was just over the year. Someone on the web told be about a workaround, which was to clean the shaft with Alcohol. That got me another 6 months maybe, and then it stopped fixing the problem. The pads for the cleaning were also always drenched, because of the frequent cleaning cycles it needed.

To try out Canon, and because I needed a color printer quick, I bought a cheapo Canon S750, just 3 colors and black, for like $80. It's such a good printer, even for occasional photos, I've not yet cost justified replacing it! It never needs a cleaning cycle, same printing habits as my Epson. It sips ink, rather than drinking it. It's quiet, except for the initial paper feed, you wouldn't know it's running. And it's very very quick.

This has been my only experience with Canon printers, but if that's generalizable, they have a customer for life. The Epson print quality was fantastic, but wasn't worth it. And of course, the 9000 series Canon's are supposed to print every bit as good as the Epson 1200 and higher series.

By the way, I still have a ton of Epson paper, and I keep buying more. The Epson Matte paper is inexpensive and prints fantastic from my Canon. Don't let the people who say you can only print to Canon Pro paper scare you away.

Let me know how you make out.

Regards--Neil

Edit: I put the wrong Canon model number.

Message edited by author 2005-02-15 10:00:49.
02/15/2005 11:40:17 AM · #3
Neil,

Thanks for the thoughts...

I plan to purchase a high quality photo printer this summer and I find your comments very helpful. I am also interested in any other experiences.
02/15/2005 11:50:24 AM · #4
I do like the look of the Epson range but I have to be honest, I've owned both Epsons and Canons in the past in both heavy and light use situations, I've only had problems with the Epsons (massive ink loss through cleaning and mechanical errors), the Canons on contrast have never let me down.

My experience however is based on units used mainly in the late 90's up until a couple of years ago, so I'm tyring to keep a fairly open mind on my next purchase in the hope that Epson have sorted out a few issues.
02/15/2005 01:39:14 PM · #5
Thanks for the comments guys.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/14/2025 05:52:54 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/14/2025 05:52:54 PM EDT.