Author | Thread |
|
02/11/2005 08:06:09 AM · #1 |
Hey, I'm about to buy a Canon EF 50mm1.8 mark I from somebody. They sent me a straight-out-of-camera sample photo and as far as I can tell it looks pretty good - but I'm used to the kit lens.
I asked the photo to be taken wide open, so there seems to be some softness to it but like I said, I don't know what to expect at 1.8.
So could I send the original file to one or two of you so you could check it out and let me know what you think?
|
|
|
02/11/2005 08:11:50 AM · #2 |
|
|
02/11/2005 08:12:59 AM · #3 |
|
|
02/11/2005 08:14:35 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by thatcloudthere: Hey, I'm about to buy a Canon EF 50mm1.8 mark I from somebody. They sent me a straight-out-of-camera sample photo and as far as I can tell it looks pretty good - but I'm used to the kit lens.
I asked the photo to be taken wide open, so there seems to be some softness to it but like I said, I don't know what to expect at 1.8.
So could I send the original file to one or two of you so you could check it out and let me know what you think? |
At F1.8 the DOF is very shallow at its' closest focusing distance - 1.5 ft. and is generally softer at the hyper-focal distance. I haven't really experimented as such but it is super at 2.5 and above. It can be soft at f22 too I'm told but I haven't really scrutinized it that much. I have the "plastic" one. I think they are the same optically.
Send it, np.
Message edited by author 2005-02-11 08:15:30.
|
|
|
02/11/2005 08:28:41 AM · #5 |
I just sent it, Owen and David...Randy, I would need your email address to send it to you.
Thanks guys!
|
|
|
02/11/2005 09:16:31 AM · #6 |
|
|
02/11/2005 09:22:07 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by thatcloudthere: Did you get it? |
No |
|
|
02/11/2005 09:25:16 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by RANDOD300: Originally posted by thatcloudthere: Did you get it? |
No |
Randy, I sent it to Owen and David...I don't have your email address. If you supply that, I can send it over...Thanks!
Message edited by author 2005-02-11 09:25:28.
|
|
|
02/11/2005 09:26:47 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by thatcloudthere: Originally posted by RANDOD300: Originally posted by thatcloudthere: Did you get it? |
No |
Randy, I sent it to Owen and David...I don't have your email address. If you supply that, I can send it over...Thanks! |
sent you a pm |
|
|
02/11/2005 09:33:32 AM · #10 |
I emailed the file to you...thanks again.
I hope to get back to him as soon as possible, so I look forward to hearing what you guys think...
|
|
|
02/11/2005 10:27:30 AM · #11 |
I shot around 180 exposures last night with friends out for our regular Thursday dinner/trivia night at the local pub... I was shooting wide open with my new 50mm f/1.8 (lighting was limited to very dim incandescent and candle light), and it performed like a champ. Shots were almost all hand-held and either ISO 800 or ISO 1600. I'll post some up today.
All in all, with my first real exercise for this lens in low-light situations, I love it.
/Andrew
|
|
|
02/11/2005 10:28:47 AM · #12 |
Cool, the sooner the better!
|
|
|
02/11/2005 10:29:14 AM · #13 |
it's a great lens and as long as it does rattle when you shake it (ie it's broken) then buy it. |
|
|
02/11/2005 10:34:55 AM · #14 |
i have not used mine much. I got some terrible chromatic aberrations, but it was under terrible conditions i am now told. I was a bit disappointed none the less.
that was wide open(1.8), dusk, ISO 400 i think. The DOF was less than i had hoped for, but the AF might have grabbed a branch and not the house.
Is a close shot - my wife was maybe 2 or 3 feet away. Notice hte shallow DOF on this one! (i was holding my daughter so my head is just behind her 13 month old head) Nice and sharp i think.
Is my bokeh entry. This was taken with a 1x and 4x quantarray close up filters and F2.8 at about 3 inches away if that from the railing. I should have used manaul focus to the biggest drop in focus better.
BTW, I have the mark 2 (plastic mount) bought new from b&h, gray market, for $70 new last month.
|
|
|
02/11/2005 10:38:49 AM · #15 |
Again, if anybody would be willing to look at the original sample image I got from the seller and let me know whether the copy looks sharp and acceptable compared to their copy that would be great. I haven't heard back from the 3 people I emailed the photo to already and I really need to get back to this guy.
It's the MkI but I also believe the optics are the same/similar.
|
|
|
02/11/2005 10:41:52 AM · #16 |
seriously, like i said, unless it's broken it's going to be a good investment. If this guy takes a bad picture using wrong settings for the situation, it's not the lens's fault :-) |
|
|
02/11/2005 10:45:52 AM · #17 |
Originally posted by GoldBerry: seriously, like i said, unless it's broken it's going to be a good investment. If this guy takes a bad picture using wrong settings for the situation, it's not the lens's fault :-) |
Are you saying that there are no bad copies or short/long focusing versions of this lens on the market after 15+ years?
|
|
|
02/11/2005 10:49:31 AM · #18 |
All down to price I suppose, I got the mk11 version for £55.00 almost throw away price. I looked on ebay for the mk1 but the prices were silly for what essentially is the same optics but better build.
No complaints, does suffer a little from fringing as stated, but only under extreme lighting situations.
My bokeh entry, not the best composition but I think pretty decent quality wise

|
|
|
02/11/2005 10:53:48 AM · #19 |
Thanks Randy and Owen, for your replies!
|
|
|
02/11/2005 10:55:07 AM · #20 |
Originally posted by peecee: |
Looks great, peecee!
Again, I'm not concerned about the lens in general. I'm confident it's a good buy, I just wanted to get a few 'second-checks' on the quality of this particular copy that I'm looking at from dpcers who actually own the lens, as they would best be able to compare.
I've gotten responses and I feel pretty good about it...thanks!
Message edited by author 2005-02-11 10:55:49.
|
|
|
02/11/2005 11:38:43 AM · #21 |
how much is it going to cost you?
if your worried buy a new one...
cheap enough
|
|
|
02/11/2005 11:42:24 AM · #22 |
Originally posted by soup: how much is it going to cost you?
if your worried buy a new one...
cheap enough |
It's $155 Canadian, about $125 US.
Message edited by author 2005-02-11 11:42:47.
|
|
|
02/11/2005 11:44:08 AM · #23 |
I have the new one, Very impressive for it's price.
|
|
|
02/11/2005 11:45:11 AM · #24 |
the new one ( mark II ) is $70.00 US
it's lighter, and has great optics...
focuses fast, good bokeh, nice and sharp.
plus no worries it would be warrantied.
|
|
|
02/11/2005 11:48:31 AM · #25 |
Originally posted by soup: the new one ( mark II ) is $70.00 US
it's lighter, and has great optics...
focuses fast, good bokeh, nice and sharp.
plus no worries it would be warrantied. |
The mark I I'm buying is actually a great value and could easily be resold at the same price for what I'm getting it for.
If I'm not mistaken the Mark I is advantageous for it's build quality (incl. metal threads), distance scale and better focus ring (that's a big one for me).
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/14/2025 12:34:33 PM EDT.