Author | Thread |
|
12/25/2004 10:05:35 PM · #1 |
at 20 mm:
at 50 mm:
at 85 mm
at 200 mm
With boumce flash at ISO 100 and Tungsten WB
What do you think ? |
|
|
12/25/2004 11:02:34 PM · #2 |
I like it. What setup are you using?
The shots are real soft. I'm assuming that is what you were looking for. |
|
|
12/25/2004 11:20:07 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by DoFear: I like it. What setup are you using?
The shots are real soft. I'm assuming that is what you were looking for. |
It must be soft :-),age-coverup !
Two 600 W Quartz lights with umbrellas. |
|
|
12/26/2004 12:06:31 AM · #4 |
|
|
12/26/2004 01:05:52 AM · #5 |
I love these. I don't think I will ever get how you produce these, but they are just superb.
|
|
|
12/26/2004 01:08:46 AM · #6 |
Darn. I really need to buy some studio lights! I love the soft effect.
|
|
|
12/26/2004 02:24:11 AM · #7 |
Not too bad. THe only criticism i can see is that there are multiple catch lights in teh eyes - particularly on the dog shot, but i see it in all the shots.
Best portraits are usually shot at 100-110mm. Your 200 looks real good.
|
|
|
12/26/2004 02:49:53 AM · #8 |
Thanks for the comments,just bought This package from BH photo. |
|
|
12/26/2004 02:52:50 AM · #9 |
How hot how bright?
I have been playing with quartz halogen work lights, and i gotta get 1500 watts or more to have any shutter speed worth anything. I have no WB issues, but the heat is there alright.
|
|
|
12/26/2004 02:58:27 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by Prof_Fate: How hot how bright?
I have been playing with quartz halogen work lights, and i gotta get 1500 watts or more to have any shutter speed worth anything. I have no WB issues, but the heat is there alright. |
Very hot,watch little children not to touch it !
With 100 ISO shutter was about 1/25 at f4 .And the room I was in was to crowded with Christmas stuff ,I had no place to put the tripod on . |
|
|
12/26/2004 03:06:04 AM · #11 |
Cool xmas pressy. :-).
I like the one of you best, in a purely photographic sense. But then I'm a sucker for a B&W. :-).
It looks like you've got the light(s) sitting below eye level of your models. It's normally best to have your key light (brigtest/closest) above eye level, as it looks more natural. At a casual glance we don't expect to see light coming from below someones face, and it can be quite un-flattering for some people.
And, for photos of someone sitting at a couch, it's neat to have the shot taken from a lower point of view thatn you have here. Then it's like you're looking across the room at them from another couch. It makes the whole thing more engaging, like a casual cup of coffee.
Someone already mentioned the multiple catch lights.. That's the bane of my life lately, so I wont offer any advice, appart from they are annoying, and you can mess around for ages getting rid of them!
I'm not a big fan of the background, but I realise you were just experimenting. If you're up for some experimentation, move the couch out from the wall, and put something to the side of the brolly ('gobo' or 'Blind' in photo geek-speek) so that the wall is shaded, but the model isn't.
Or, if there's trees outside, open the blinds and shoot at dusk.
I've got some really nice shots taken of a couple on a couch, window behind and the curtains were terrible so I opened them up and metered to have the outside light 2 stops lower than the key light. I'll post a copy if you're intersted, but don't want to hi-jack your thread. :-).
As always, my 2c worth..
Cheers, Me.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/09/2025 08:25:40 AM EDT.