Author | Thread |
|
11/15/2004 12:46:15 PM · #1 |
we went to portsmouth on a whim - sort of - this weekend.
i recently picked up a canon 50mm f:1.8, and a sigma 105mm f:2.8 EX DG macro lense. i only used these two lenses while there to test them out.
i will say for certain now, that the glass makes a huge difference in image quality. the sharpness of these lenses is incredible, and the color rendition spot on.
the boat photo was handheld from 100yds away, and there is a small sign on it ( can't read it here ) but i did a 100% crop, and the text on it is perfectly clear.
anyway here is a couple shots, i will post some more tonight when i fully got through them. i will also straighten the crooked building tonight ;} these are uncropped - unedited photos - slight sharpening ( 50% - 0.6 - 0 ) for the web sized versions.
|
|
|
11/15/2004 01:09:46 PM · #2 |
Thinking of buying both a 50mm (can't decide between the 1.4 and 1.8 - so glad to see some gorgeous shots) and the 100mm Canon vs. the 105mm Sigma. So thanks for posting your pics. It seems like you are happy with those two? |
|
|
11/15/2004 01:23:42 PM · #3 |
Pretty good detail in all those shots, maybe a little more in the one's from the 50, IMHO. |
|
|
11/15/2004 01:25:14 PM · #4 |
yeah quite happy with both.
the infinity setting on the sigma is awesome.
the 50mm f:1.8 feels a bit cheap, but it's what's inside that counts, and that seems to be high quality.
there are a few more from both in my profile. though i have only had them a few days - i am happy i spent the money.
by buying the sigma macro over the canon - i was able to buy the canon 50mm f:1.8
thanks for looking ;}
these are not from portsmouth

|
|
|
11/15/2004 01:29:24 PM · #5 |
these web sized shots don't really do them justice. the detail from the sigma - even at a distant subject is really pretty good.
discernable feathers on a flying pigeon that's 100 or so feet above my head... i'll post more from the weekend tonight when i hopefully will get a chance to sit at MY computer...
i quickly looked through all the photos last night, and must have said WOW ( at the detail ) 50 times ;}
i had the urge to use the efs18-55mm a few times for some wider angles - but now i am glad i opted not to ( and had vowed not to ) - i think i would have been disappointed with the results.
Originally posted by coolhar: Pretty good detail in all those shots, maybe a little more in the one's from the 50, IMHO.
|
Message edited by author 2004-11-15 13:29:43.
|
|
|
11/15/2004 11:52:35 PM · #6 |
a couple more - time is quite tight.

|
|
|
11/16/2004 12:00:55 AM · #7 |
Hey there,
I have been to Portsmouth a few times - one of my favorite places. I live on the other side of NH so I can't get there too often. Love your pics. I took the following shot in Portsmouth last summer - if you get a chance sometime, go in the summer and wonder through the gardens:)

|
|
|
11/16/2004 12:48:41 AM · #8 |
strawberry bank
used to live in the area - love the chili fest they have there....
thanks for looking.
|
|
|
11/16/2004 10:40:49 AM · #9 |
|
|
11/16/2004 01:35:13 PM · #10 |
i added a number of other photos from portsmouth - you can see them here.
Portsmouth - New Hampshire
Message edited by author 2004-11-16 13:35:27.
|
|
|
11/16/2004 09:13:57 PM · #11 |
|
|
11/16/2004 09:42:42 PM · #12 |
The seagull shot is very nice. Makes me want the 100 prime. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 12:59:53 PM EDT.