Digital Evolution
by sahko

Comment:
I'd love it to be the case that these all store the same amount of data. Nice stock photo, though perhaps a litle less square-on to the camera would give more interest: would quite like to see a perspective shot where they all take the same space in the frame, but are obviously receding into the distance.

FireWork
by ashitshah16

Comment:
:-) Nice shot too - and nice comment about previous challenges.I always find shots purely of fireworks pretty dull though - I think they need some context.

The Money Bag
by evmariedogs

Comment:
The moving coins are weird - almost unnoticeable, and i can't see the point of them. Technically a very good photo, absolutely no problems there, but I can't really see it's relevance to the challenge - did people never have money bags before? Is it dated somehow and I just don't know that?

The word on the street
by johnm

Comment:
Neat idea, and approach. Think I'd have shot from a little further away and zoomed in or cropped to avoid the distortion of the 't'. Not sure how it could be changed, but it seems a quite dirty photo, though I guess that's to do with the reflection and the window.

Use to be full of horses, now only one remains.
by Flynn

Comment:
Why have the horse dead centre frame? I would think you could crop to the pillar beside it's head, and almost up to it's hooves and lose none of the important information and at the same time increase the compositional impact. It's a really nice capture though, great moment. levels and contrast could perhaps be usefully played with too.

Political Sensitivity
by johnnykillchrist

Comment:
Taken through glass? If you get closer to the window the dirt on the glass becomes less of an issue. Either that, or of course your lens is filthy! Quite a bit of jpeg noise, and not sure how the image fits the challenge. I expect a bunch of the Americans will find it deliberately offensive - I also expect that was the point. Trends?

billiards or pools...whatever you call it...
by gcosue

Comment:
I'd be intersted to know why this shot was submitted: the only good point that I can see is in the relative positions f the two figures: the motion blur, focus, colour depth, exposure are all pretty bad though, and I can't see a good reason for it being there.

1960's Coffee Bar
by tonyw

Comment:
Poor lighting: the reflections of the flash are horrrible, and I think the white balance has become confused - see how orange the white floor tiles are. Nice enough subject, but it needs natural light to stop it flattening out like this.

The Golden Age of Art Deco Architecture
by magnetic9999

Comment:
Good illustration - think I'd like to see more texture in the stonework though.

Silent spectators
by sunson

Comment:
Intriguing: though I find this selective desaturation technique a touch obvious now, and often used to make a dull photo more intersting. This does have a remoteness and desertedness that appeals though - and the over-exposure is well done. It's like a strange dream scene. No idea what to score it though ... :-)