water water...Am I the cutest camera?
by honikum

Comment:
Back to comment: This image has very little detail of the camera visible and it could use more contrast. You could have used a couple of reflectors (white poster board or crumpled aluminum foil) to help direct some light between you and the water to improve the detail issue. The contrast issue is fixable using a number of post processing tools, like brightness/contrast, levels, or curves. I'm not that experienced with curves but I would be willing to play around with your image with levels if you would like to see how it might look. Feel free to PM me.

Salute to the Rising Sun
by swallace

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club:

I did not vote on this challenge so this is the first time I've looked at your entry. I'm impressed with the your timing on this shot and how well you stopped the action. I also like the off center composition. I would have given this a 6, as there are a couple of areas that come up a little short. First, with the way the lighting fall on the duck's face, I really would have liked to have seen the duck's eye in better focus. Although the wings are where the stopped action is, the lighting naturally draws the viewer's attention to the face. Second, I agree with skiprow that the picture looks a bit over sharpened. Three is a large halo effect along the back of the duck. This is often the result of over sharpening.

Feel free to PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim

Circle in Circle in Square.
by Nobody

Comment:
The lighting and composition of this image is exceptional. The camera ain't bad either ;-)

Toasty
by Shermy

Comment:
Creative idea, great lighting. This would have been a 10 if the camera was mounted on tripod.

"Old Tyme Camera Family Portrait"
by jmosher

Comment:
Bumping this to a 9. Great lighting and conversion to B&W.

Message edited by author 2006-08-23 06:09:34.

Tail Spin
by JacquiD

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

I didn't vote on the Stopped Action II challenge so this is the first time I've looked at your entry. From reading the comments left during the challenge, I see they hit most of the major issues with this image, the hot spot from the flash, your choice of background, and the high noise. The hot spot on the edge of the coin could have been reduced if you used a diffuser on your flash or bounced it off the ceiling. A solid colored background (Poster board or heavy card stock) definitely would have helped the coin to stand out more and would have been less distracting than the tabletop used. And there are a couple of good noise reduction softwares available for free if you don't already have one. I might have also tried a square crop for this image, as there isn't any advantage to keeping the negative space on the left for right.

Tim

Feet!
by BakerBug

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

I remember thinking when I voted on this image that it would fit better in the Action Shot II category then it did Transportation. The reasoning behind my thinking was that the boat pulling the skier had more to do with the mode of transportation than the fact that the skier wasn't using skies. With that in mind, I still liked the shot and considered the image as meeting the challenge, but just not strongly. I would guess from the number of 1, 2, and 3 scores you received that not all of the voters were as liberal in interpreting the challenge as I.

As for the image itself, there are a couple of technical shortcomings that may have had a negative affect on your score as well. First, the skier is placed a little too close to the center of the image. If the image had more of the towrope showing and less of the water behind the skier, the rope would have been a much stronger leading line to the main subject, the skier. Second, the image is a bit flat and could use more contrast and saturation to give it more depth and pop. With the red tonality of the skin, you might need to do some selective saturation to boost the pop factor. I would start with boosting the blue saturation then try green and maybe magenta.

Feel free to PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim

Edit: Typo

Message edited by author 2006-08-16 14:06:42.

The M
by carpents

Comment:
Congratulations on your top 20.

Tim

Good Ole' Peas!
by Candi20

Comment:
I can tell you put some effort into the planning and staging of this image. First, the image suffers a little from the black and white conversion performed. You did a nice job of keeping the lettering on the cans from blowing out but the image has mostly darks and lights with very little grey in between. If you have Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro, I would suggest your read Fotomann’s B&W tutorial (Learn menu – Tutorial link). I also think the image would have benefited from a smoother background. This type of photo works well when you use a single piece of poster board or heavy card stock for the base and background.

Peas that glow
by Trumpeteer4

Comment:
Back to comment: I had some difficulty figuring out where to score this entry. I can see that the left side of the image is nicely in focus; however, the brighter lighting on the right side keeps drawing my eyes to the peas that are not as sharply focused. I think if you cropped about a peas width off the right and 1/2 a peas width worth of negative space off the bottom, the focal point for the image would shift to the peas that are in focus. I do like the lighting, contrast, and the color saturation and I have decided to give this a bump from my first impression.