JUMP
by nikmatic

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club. I thought you picked a very good subject for this challenge and I gave it a 7. The issue with shooting into the sun is that the colors of your subject tend to look flat. This image could have used a bit more saturation to make the jumper stand out more. However, just bumping the saturation would have made the jumper's skin look too red so you would need to play around to determine which colors to selectively saturate (Blues and greens probably).

If you have any questions regarding this critique, please feel free to send me a PM.

Tim

Message edited by author 2006-08-22 11:52:48.

Untitled (Peas and Black Calla)
by betsypdx

Comment:
Betsy,

Loved the colors in this photo and I gave it a 7. I agree with thomaspeople in that I would have like to have seen a couple of more peas in the image. That FA 100 macro lens looks like a keeper for sure.

Tim

Belly Up
by Hoochie

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club.

As you can gather from the comments left during the challenge (mine included), this image definitely was a little out of the box for this challenge. On the technical side, you did a very nice job with the lighting. The sunflower is nicely lit without having blown highlights and the woman has good skin tones and no harsh shadows. As for the composition of the image, I found the placement of her elbow and the sunflower a bit awkward. One suggestion would be to have the woman facing the sunflower. That way the sunflower would have been a complimenting subject instead of a competing one. I'm finding that when shooting for these challenges that I need to try slight variations in the composition when shooting. Two of my top three scores were second efforts, as they ended up being stronger images than my original setup. You're making progress and keep shooting. Feel free to PM me if you want some constructive comments on any of your future entries.

Tim

Pears
by Shea927

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club.

I like your subject choice for this challenge and gave you a 6 on this image because I thought the subject met the challenge and you executed your idea well. The only suggestion I have to improve this image is to try using a square crop to eliminate some of the dead space at the top of the image. As presented, the section of tree branch without any fruit and the section of sky without clouds at the top of the photo act as negative space with no real purpose. I would suggest cropping the top of the image down to just below the node where the branch holding the top pear meets the main branch. Give it a try and see how this changes the balance of the image.

PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim

Message edited by author 2006-08-22 07:40:35.

Mighty Redwoods in Infrared
by madhale

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club.

First, congratulations on entering your first challenge and achieving a very, very good score. Second, I have to compliment you on your choice of camera. And now, on to your challenge entry. I scored this one a 7 because I felt it was a strong subject choice for the challenge and that you executed your idea very well. I've never shot infrared and have seen very few of these types of images but if you scan through the challenge archives, you will see that infrared images are not the norm at DPC. Comparing your entry to some of the other infrared images submitted in other challenges, your image doesn't have nearly as much contrast as the higher scoring images. I think if you could have made the leaves look a little whiter, it would have met the infrared expectations of the general DPC population a bit more. Is that possible in this image without blowing out the sky? If not, then shooting during a different time of day may have produced a stronger infrared result.

PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim

Two Bridges
by photoneer

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club.

This image is very well done and a good subject choice for this challenge. I remember when I voted on this image that I liked the bridge and the technical aspects of the image but that there was a lot of other stuff competing for attention. The part of this image that grabs my attention first is the under lighting of the bridge. This part of the photo shows great texture and really addresses the subject of the challenge. From there, my eyes went to the far right side of the image to the lights reflecting in the water. Then I glanced over to the colors in the sky over by the second bridge. As you can see, the great from the ground up perspective was lost by all of the other pleasant looking things in this image.

Here are a few suggestions you could try to see if they help bring focus to your image. I suggest you crop off the reflected lights on the right side of the image, including the two bright lights that are under the bridge. Since the eye naturally looks from left to right, this crop would eliminate the competing subject of the reflected light and make the second lighted bridge support a complimentary secondary subject. I would also suggest cropping some off the left side of the image so the bridge bisects the upper left corner. This will let the bridge act as a leading line to the wonderful lighting underneath. If you feel like re-shooting this image, I would suggest staying a little longer and see how it looks when there is less color in the sky on the left. This bridge has so much texture and character that it should be able to stand on it own merit.

If you have any questions regarding this critique, feel free to send my a PM.

Tim

Essence of Grace
by Weefan

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club:

I didn̢۪t vote on this challenge so this is the first time I̢۪ve looked at your entry. Let me congratulate you on a great looking image for your first challenge. My first impression was Wow. As you can tell from the comments made during voting, this is not the strongest subject choice for a Stopped Action challenge. However, chasing a butterfly is not easy and you surly did a nice job capturing this one. One suggestion I can offer is to crop just a little bit off the top of the image. If you crop the image so that the purple flower intersects the upper left corner, it becomes a very strong leading line to your butterfly. As cropped, the flower acts more like a leading line out of the image. This is an image that you should be proud to have in your portfolio.

Tim

Message edited by author 2006-08-19 09:23:03.

Who let the bunny out ?!??!!
by zymara

Comment:
Where to start. First, since the bunny appears to be looking to see if there is food in its bowl, it looks more like it is use to being free verses getting loose. The concept would have been stronger if the food bin had been tipped over and the rabbit feasting away on the spillage. Second, the red eye is really bad in this image. Not sure if you have bounce flash capability or not but this would have been a good time to use it. An alternative angle would have been another solution.

white begins, black wins
by annev

Comment:
Sorry but I don't see the Stupid, Stupid part of this image. The closest I can come to for Stupidity is that the black still thinks they have a chance to win even though there is only one black piece remaining. This image also suffers from poor contrast. The whites need to be whiter and the blacks blacker. I suggest you read the B&W conversion tutorial written by photomann under the Learn/Tutorial menu.

Edit: Now I see the Stupid, Stupid part, as the black piece will actually win. Guess I was too stupid to catch it.

Message edited by author 2006-08-25 12:18:37.

How not to pick your nose!
by die2board

Comment:
I can't tell if this was set up of just a lucky capture but I'm sorry to say but the subject doesn't really look like he is doing what the title implies. With his knee and chin both in front of the pine tree, the concept of the tree being up his nose is no longer plausible. This image also suffers from the harsh lighting conditions. Either the contrast needs to be adjusted to put the man in complete silhouette or you need to use fill flash when the sun is behind the subject.