Enchanted Falls
by elsapo

Comment:
it seems that the darkness of the photos indicates a two-second exposure could have been achieved in the right lighting. later or earlier in the day would have allowed for this. too bad you didn't think that was important or you wouldn't have submitted this 1/2 second shot taken with too much available light.

Surf Thongs
by cushla

Comment:
pretty cool, although over manipulation in the 'lab' can cause lower scores

Drink Up!
by erkinne

Comment:
can't believe you didn't do better. the prestone must not be visible on everyone's monitor's. people need to adjust their monitors around here if they are going to vote on photographs. it's not fair to others because their monitor is too dark and they can't see the subtleness of a great shot such as this one. sorry.

Message edited by author 2006-03-15 10:47:22.

Thinker
by deepfrog17

Comment:
it's a paper cut out of the 'thinker' and lit with an led in front and then a mag-lite for four seconds of the exposure for some backlighting. not sure if everyone saw it was a house plant instead of and actual tree. oh well, i thought it was too obvious, however it seems too 'disguised' for many. still a nice score. thanks to all who commented. too bad to see not much 'mastering of disguise' in this challenge.

Behind the veil
by keeda

Comment:
somthings up with his/her nose right? i hope. i guess it's not obviuos enough though.

Downtown
by jdunn

Comment:
i like it. i think it's a cheese grater?? dunno for sure, but nicely done. moving on up.

Pointless
by kteach

Comment:
thanks for making it simple.

Blends In
by angela_packard

Comment:
ok. but i would have gone with a dalmation and some cows. moo.

Roads crossed
by Antonino

Comment:
just don't get it. do i. nope.

Judge
by phoenix46

Comment:
man your pics really are cool. bumping up a little