Image |
Comment |
| 08/08/2011 10:07:24 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/08/2011 10:06:52 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/08/2011 10:06:30 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/08/2011 10:05:36 PM |
The hair flipby markwileyComment: This is very cool. I'd try to saturate and contrast it a bit, but otherwise great timing.
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/08/2011 10:04:43 PM |
IMG_5013 800by Yo_SpiffComment: That is one odd looking bike, I have never seen one with different size wheels like that. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2011 03:37:53 PM |
Strike!!!!!!!by MattOComment: Originally posted by K10DGuy: I didn't vote, but here's my take:
In a bokeh challenge, the key is to get the bokeh to be the defining feature of the shot. You should be able to look at the photo and say, "The background elements contribute to the overall feeling of the photo". Is that what can be said about this shot? Well, not really.
What defines this shot IS the frozen ball. Period. It's the whole reason the shot exists, and the whole reason for looking at the photo. It's "Wow, he got a ball frozen in time during a pitch! cool!" However, we don't even care one iota about background elements. They are secondary and provide no meaning to the photo.
In a bokeh challenge, you need the BOKEH to be what's looked at and talked about. Instead, you have the ball being that primary aspect, and the ball isn't bokeh.
Quite frankly, a 6.2+ is far more than this shot probably SHOULD have got, but you scored higher than I would have thought it would have placed because you did manage to wow people with the frozen action and got them to look past the fact that bokeh plays no part. So instead of looking negatively that the score might have been higher, look positively that it's actually as high as it is. |
Really? You think the person who threw that ball and the person that caught that ball has nothing to with telling the story of the ball? To me the people in this photo tell the story. Message edited by author 2011-05-04 16:40:22. |
| 04/29/2011 10:13:57 AM |
Lightheaded by gyabanComment: I'm glad everyone likes this, but it looks more like Tim Burton digital art than photography to me.
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/06/2011 09:12:49 PM |
20110129-IMG_0240-Editby MinsoPhotoComment: Very nice, although with a portrait like this I prefer a bit of light on the background so it's not totally black. I like the pose and the crop though. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/06/2011 09:08:32 PM |
Kelseyby NeilComment: On this one here I'd watch the beginning of Raccoon eyes. Your light is a bit high, or just not quite enough reflector to help fill them. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/06/2011 09:05:40 PM |
Kelseyby NeilComment: This is very nice Neil. One thing I might work on is to do a little(emphasis on little) on brightening her teeth just a touch. Also you might try to raise the shadow on the left of her face just a bit. Her eye socket in the inside is just a bit dark. One thing to consider is raising your light on that side to bring the shadow more down instead of straight over, or fill it with a reflector or another light. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/01/2025 11:38:16 PM EDT.