Image |
Comment |
| 03/14/2015 10:36:43 PM |
|
| 03/14/2015 10:09:31 PM |
the photographerby 2mccsComment: I really like the shot, but think it would have worked better without the photographer in the foreground. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/11/2015 05:12:12 PM |
I love Canonby bennettjamieComment: The first thing I noticed was the composition. I'm all for having it off center, but in this case I would have had more space on the right side instead of left. The eyes bother me. Her right eye is fine, but the left could have been a bit brighter. The sharpest area of the photo is the camera and glasses, where I would have preferred her eyes. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/19/2014 01:57:26 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/16/2014 09:18:18 PM |
|
| 11/13/2014 12:25:54 PM |
Just Another Saturday Nightby KenComment: Originally posted by HarveyG: Hi Ken, thanks! I don't mind the softness as much as most here might. It was just an observation.
You should be able to recreate the star(burst) effect with f/16 or more. I use Topaz Labs ReMask coupled with Topaz Labs DeNoise to only work on the sky noise, and leave the rest of the image sharp. Odd that you should get noise at 100 ISO? What camera? |
I used a Canon 350D. Original processing was done in 2008 and when I combined the photos for HDR I didn't care too much, this was from a "photo of the day" side challenge I participated in.
I don't think the person was fishing, usually people climb on that side to just chill. |
| 11/12/2014 05:43:41 PM |
Just Another Saturday Nightby KenComment: Originally posted by HarveyG: Super image, with the right lines, colours and the obligatory star effect. Possibly quite hard to do considering the rotating nature of the light source. Did the longish exposure highlight a bit of camera shake or is the new 1200px size harder to post process crisp sharp images? (I had difficulty and reprocessed my own entry 3 times to get it where I wanted it sharpness wise versus how my 800px images are processed.) I'm noticing that the 1200px images appear softer than their 800px counterparts. And yes I have a decent IPS LCD to be able to see the image at it's best. 8. |
It was a bit sharper and then at the last minute decided to remove a bit of noise from the sky; the resulting image was a tad softer but I felt it fit the mood of the image. Essentially it was an artistic choice, not technical difficulty.
The lighthouse is not active and the light doesn't rotate anymore. Since I took this photo they replaced with another light and that nature star effect is gone. |
| 06/17/2014 11:47:23 AM |
Lonesome Doveby skewsmeComment: I love the colors and overall softness, but would be nice to see a bit more of the head in focus. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/12/2014 01:35:28 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/12/2014 01:30:43 PM |
Gold Minerby luddeComment: One of my favorites so far in voting. I like how his face is hidden, it leaves much to the imagination. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/01/2025 10:22:27 AM EDT.