Image |
Comment |
| 04/14/2005 07:48:05 PM |
Valley Forgeby gedisaComment by ReallyColorBlind: Not too bad. I would have moved the building off center though. Also, I would go back out at different times in the day and try this one again. I think you could have had better lighting. |
| 04/14/2005 12:53:11 PM |
|
| 04/14/2005 11:06:06 AM |
|
| 04/14/2005 10:43:17 AM |
|
| 04/14/2005 10:35:08 AM |
Valley Forgeby gedisaComment by Barry: This photo brings up a the question, Can a reconstructed building that was never really occupied be abandoned?...Don't worry I am not evaluating this image on the question.
This is a nice stap shot......but what I find distracting is that the image is smack in the middle of the frame making it appearing to be rather heavy........not really a good reason for a bad score....I think you did a good job on the printing all though a little bit more attention to the in camera focus seems to be needed...5... |
| 04/13/2005 08:47:38 AM |
|
| 04/13/2005 03:38:28 AM |
Valley Forgeby gedisaComment by BK26: The lighting is too harsh here and the composition is poor. You should have placed the building off to the side of the image, and shot it later or earlier in the day. |
| 02/22/2005 12:50:20 PM |
Red Bridgeby gedisaComment by cardmaverick: This seems a bit washed out, I'd try using a faster shutter speed to keep the center tree from burning up. |
| 02/20/2005 09:44:05 PM |
|
| 02/19/2005 12:44:21 PM |
Red Bridgeby gedisaComment by Mr_Pants: If this were my picture, I might have tried turning up the saturation of the green channel a bit and added a bit more sharpening. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/28/2024 02:24:36 PM EDT.