Sew Real
by toddhead

Comment:
Brilliant idea! A bit blown out on the left, and I'd have tried to get the man "upright" for easier recognition, but what a super idea!

Laughing Stock...Bad Hair Day :(
by jerowe

Comment:
Not particularly appealing, but well photographed and kudos for bringing personality to such a simple object.

The doorway to hell!
by bmartuch

Comment:
LOL- it took me a second to find the face. You could have cropped the top down to the horns and a bit of the messy bottom to get the image bigger for more impact. Nice face, though.

Lone King
by whiterook

Comment:
Um, yeah... is it just a coincidence that the central figures are white rooks?

Cool and Refreshing
by Cutter

Comment:
The glass is nice and all, but what REALLY impresses me is that you were able to get Chuck Norris to model for you! ;-)

Ok, But It Makes the Matting All Soggy!
by EBJones

Comment:
Now why didn't I think of that? ;-)

Absolutely brilliant!

Staredown: Canada Lynx @ 640mm
by scalvert

Comment:

Originally posted by rob_banks: ...if the guy that took the picture of the STUFFED Canadian Lynx had won, he still wins.

I'm pretty sure that's been done (it was a museum display), but I couldn't find it in a brief search.

Staredown: Canada Lynx @ 640mm
by scalvert

Comment:

Originally posted by rob_banks: "Ha. Look at me! I'm on the Site Council, I can make up rules as I go along! Nanananana!!!"

The challenge description is not a rule. Your own "At the Beach" entry was all water, when the challenge description clearly defined beach as the strip of land bordering the water. Did you break the rules? No.

Staredown: Canada Lynx @ 640mm
by scalvert

Comment:
Zoo shots were within the rules and fared well in Wildlife I and Wildlife II without complaint. Considering the time and effort I spent in sub-zero wind chills to get this, I would hardly call it poor sportsmanship to poke fun at myself.

Message edited by author 2007-01-29 22:24:24.

MAJESTIC
by AlexSaberi

Comment:
Bad news Alex... I'm gonna have to ban you. I used to OWN the 70-200 lens page, but you've been blowing right through it with these so-called "amazing" photos. Oh, suuuuure... that's fine if you like amazing. Some of us are into mediocre and would appreciate a little consideration. Sorry dude, but I really have no choice. You can come back when you switch to Nikon or buy a lens I can't afford.

*mumble*stinkinfreakinawesomephotographer*mumble*