| Image |
Comment |
| 06/17/2003 04:18:32 PM |
|
| 06/17/2003 04:56:34 AM |
|
| 06/15/2003 06:56:51 PM |
|
| 06/14/2003 07:09:07 AM |
Playboyby iconsueComment by KING: I think you have chosen the wrong magazine for this photo. With all due respects but this photo would never make it to Playboy :). |
| 06/14/2003 06:37:15 AM |
Playboyby iconsueComment by LarsPaysen: I don't think the angle would make this picture a candidate for a Playboy cover. The suggestiveness is a little too subtle - I'd wager something more direct would have worked better. People that buy Playboy don't want to think too hard (except those that buy it for the articles :)) |
| 06/13/2003 11:23:13 PM |
Playboyby iconsueComment by K-Rob: Sexy. But the yellowish tone of the lighting doesn't suit it very well. The angle is also too unusual to make it work, although I can understand if you were trying for the effect without revealing TOO much. ;) |
| 06/13/2003 03:42:51 PM |
Playboyby iconsueComment by oldwisemonk: I doubt Playboy would ever have a cover like that. I think they are a little more into the full body or almost full body shot on the cover. Cool shot though. |
| 06/13/2003 09:14:10 AM |
Playboyby iconsueComment by gaja_tz: nice legs but a little bit blurry. also color cast looks very yellowish. composition does not look OK also. = 4 |
| 06/13/2003 02:26:20 AM |
Playboyby iconsueComment by ChrisW123: Hehehehe, looks more like a "peep" shot taken from a hidden camera or something. |
| 06/12/2003 11:19:54 PM |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/20/2025 12:10:27 AM EDT.
