| Image |
Comment |
| 03/31/2009 09:17:14 PM |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/30/2009 07:08:42 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/30/2009 09:04:29 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/29/2009 06:59:32 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/29/2009 03:13:19 PM |
Swish!by bobnospumComment by vawendy: I've been using the definition: "Of, relating to, or being a style of art in which natural objects are not represented realistically." With this in mind, it really doesn't fit abstract, IMO. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/29/2009 01:52:32 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/29/2009 03:10:05 AM |
Swish!by bobnospumComment by Titia: You could have gotten more out of this. Composition is ok, colors too, there is motion, but it could have been much more abstract. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/27/2009 11:47:01 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/27/2009 11:35:38 PM |
Swish!by bobnospumComment by rodfulk: I like the contrasting colors I would not necessarily call this an abstract photo. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/27/2009 08:35:28 PM |
Swish!by bobnospumComment by K3Master: It's got a good motion to it, but the abstract connection is extremely thin. There's just a little too much anchorage in reality here. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/23/2026 11:27:41 AM EDT.
